Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/eai-support/eai-goferWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/eai-support/eai-gofer/7_gofer_save)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/eai-support/eai-gofer/7_gofer_save"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/eai-support/eai-gofer/7_gofer_save/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/eai-support/eai-gofer/7_gofer_save"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/eai-support/eai-gofer/7_gofer_save.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00022 | $0.07352 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.02941 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.01470 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00735 |
Grade A, and why
7_gofer_save scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 561 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
description: Save session progress with comprehensive checkpoint for resumption
Gofer Save
Continuation And Stop Contract
- Preserve the requested scope and mode, including read-only, plan-only, research-only and MVP work. Keep the full applicable pipeline, stage functions, artifacts, reviews and validation; do not expand an MVP into an unapproved release.
- After a stage's required evidence is complete, read and follow the next internal file in .specify/commands/ in the same conversation. Do not require a numbered command or a host-specific skill dispatcher. Optional helpers remain optional; maintenance and control commands do not start delivery work.
- Treat the stated business goal as authority for ordinary planning, task ordering, design, diagnosis, repair, testing, and reversible repository changes within scope. Record material Gofer decisions with their reason and effect. Do not ask the user to choose implementation details that Gofer can safely decide.
- Ask only when the goal is unclear or changes, the action is irreversible or destructive, it changes security or access, it creates external cost or commitment, it changes production or public exposure, it requires missing authority or credentials, or it conflicts with an explicit user constraint. Record the exact reason before asking. missing or ambiguous approval is not approval when an approval boundary applies. Rejected, revoked, changed or unclear authority requires a pause.
- Pause for material scope, security, cost, deployment, destructive or protected files/boundary changes and any outstanding user gate. A business goal does not authorize publishing, spending, external changes, or bypassing host permissions. Complete safe authorized work without bypassing the blocked gate.
- A tool proposal is not execution. If host consent is required, wait for it. After the tool result or approved proposal returns, inspect the result and resume the next authorized action within approved scope; do not end with only a plan or a proposed tool call. A denied tool or unavailable capability must not be bypassed through another host or CLI.
- Use the current agent's available native tools. Optional Gofer/MCP tools are conveniences, not prerequisites. If the current agent lacks a required capability, report that limitation and the safe next action; do not pretend a handoff button transfers control automatically.
- Stop after research only when research-only work was requested, the user paused, or a real gate blocks progress. Otherwise continue to specification. At validation, report completion only when the requested scope's required evidence passes; failures remain unfinished work.
- Respect budget, context and retry limits from the existing loop contract. Repair safe within-scope failures only within those limits. Preserve a checkpoint before an orderly context stop; resume by reading its recorded stage and rechecking scope, approvals and evidence. Never claim an abrupt host termination was handled.
- Report concise Progress during work. At every controlled stop, report Progress, Stop reason and Next action, including the exact missing input or approval and unfinished work. Reasons are requested scope complete, user pause, approval required, material change, missing capability/access, validation blocked, or budget/context/retry limit. Stage completion alone is not pipeline completion.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +8 lines 92d11b1c2b93
- 1mo ago Changed · +4 lines d60fa57af01a
- 1mo ago Changed · -4 lines 6eea12a84604
- 1mo ago Changed · +10 lines cc6367f1368c
- 1mo ago Changed 78a64269e87f
- 1mo ago Changed · +7 lines a529023cbac2
- 1mo ago Changed · +23 lines 22bea6da40e4
- 1mo ago Changed · +17 lines ed80fff5daf1
- 2mo ago First seen · 496 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A 007537123b73
7_gofer_save is a command published in the GitHub repository eai-support/eai-gofer (1 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 7,352 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
7_gofer_save compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7_gofer_saveeai-support/eai-gofer | Command | 1 | 5d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 22 | Claude Code |
| graphskynetcmd/m3-memory | Command | 30 | 11d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 20 | Claude Code |
| shipGuillemRoca/agent-skills-android | Command | 5 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 29 | Claude Code |
| handoffyuri-semenenko/ai-engineering-workspace | Command | 4 | 3d ago | MIT | A | 24 | GitHub Copilot |
| specGuillemRoca/agent-skills-android | Command | 5 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| installskynetcmd/m3-memory | Command | 30 | 11d ago | Apache-2.0 | C | 14 | Claude Code |
| tailsstereosam/stereo-vibe-public | Command | 1 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 29 | Claude Code |