7a_stakeholder_comms

7a_stakeholder_comms is a command for Claude Code from eai-support/eai-gofer. It costs 23 tokens per session (6,421 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A communications command that prepares release notes, demonstration scripts, change briefs, and success measures.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to explain a release, plan a demo, or document how a change should be introduced.
Why use it?
It turns technical work into information that stakeholders can understand and use.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: $ARGUMENTS substitution. Also seen: mentions subagents; mentions Codex.

Needs its repository: it runs a file that does not travel with it, so clone the repository first. The line is node .specify/scripts/node/lib/assemble-stakeholder-pack.mjs $FEATURE_DIR.

Part of the eai-gofer plugin — 4 skills, 28 commands, 42 agents, 3 hooks, 1 MCP server shipped together

Good fit Use it to explain a release, plan a demo, or document how a change should be introduced.

Compare 6 commands from other repositories ↓
Install

Getting it into your agent

It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/eai-support/eai-gofer
agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/eai-support/eai-gofer/7a_stakeholder_comms

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install eai-gofer, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 4 skills, 28 commands, 42 agents, 3 hooks, 1 MCP server.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for 7a_stakeholder_comms

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/eai-support/eai-gofer/7a_stakeholder_comms.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/eai-support/eai-gofer/7a_stakeholder_comms)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/eai-support/eai-gofer/7a_stakeholder_comms"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/eai-support/eai-gofer/7a_stakeholder_comms.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 23 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 6,421 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00023 $0.06421
Opus 5 $0.00012 $0.03210
Sonnet 5 $0.00005 $0.01284
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00642

Measured today against content hash db23c931c15e, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-08, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

7a_stakeholder_comms scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.specify/commands/7a_stakeholder_comms.md · 597 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 597 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.


description: Generate stakeholder communications package including release notes, demo script, change management brief, and success metrics

Gofer Stakeholder Communications

Continuation And Stop Contract

  1. Preserve the requested scope and mode, including read-only, plan-only, research-only and MVP work. Keep the full applicable pipeline, stage functions, artifacts, reviews and validation; do not expand an MVP into an unapproved release.
  2. After a stage's required evidence is complete, read and follow the next internal file in .specify/commands/ in the same conversation. Do not require a numbered command or a host-specific skill dispatcher. Optional helpers remain optional; maintenance and control commands do not start delivery work.
  3. After explicit business-specification approval, continue routine planning, tasks, implementation and validation within that approved scope. Record the approval source and scope; missing or ambiguous approval is not approval. A proposal or generated status is not user consent.
  4. Preserve any explicit plan/task approval requirement unless it is already satisfied by recorded user approval covering that work. Rejected, revoked, changed or unclear approval requires a pause. Never invent approvedBy, approvedAt or a new approval event when reusing an existing approval.
  5. Pause for material scope, security, cost, deployment, destructive or protected files/boundary changes and any outstanding user gate. Business approval does not authorize publishing, spending, external changes or bypassing host permissions. Complete safe authorized work without bypassing the blocked gate.
  6. A tool proposal is not execution. If host consent is required, wait for it. After the tool result or approved proposal returns, inspect the result and resume the next authorized action within approved scope; do not end with only a plan or a proposed tool call. A denied tool or unavailable capability must not be bypassed through another host or CLI.
  7. Use the current agent's available native tools. Optional Gofer/MCP tools are conveniences, not prerequisites. If the current agent lacks a required capability, report that limitation and the safe next action; do not pretend a handoff button transfers control automatically.
  8. Stop after research only when research-only work was requested, the user paused, or a real gate blocks progress. Otherwise continue to specification. At validation, report completion only when the requested scope's required evidence passes; failures remain unfinished work.
  9. Respect budget, context and retry limits from the existing loop contract. Repair safe within-scope failures only within those limits. Preserve a checkpoint before an orderly context stop; resume by reading its recorded stage and rechecking scope, approvals and evidence. Never claim an abrupt host termination was handled.
  10. Report concise Progress during work. At every controlled stop, report Progress, Stop reason and Next action, including the exact missing input or approval and unfinished work. Reasons are requested scope complete, user pause, approval required, material change, missing capability/access, validation blocked, or budget/context/retry limit. Stage completion alone is not pipeline completion.

Read the full file on GitHub · 597 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. today Changed · +16 lines db23c931c15e
  2. 4d ago First seen · 581 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A b6840958b1c9

Subscribe to this mod's changes

7a_stakeholder_comms is a command published in the GitHub repository eai-support/eai-gofer (1 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 6,421 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.