Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/echoVic/blade-codeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/echovic/blade-code/debug)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/echovic/blade-code/debug"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/echovic/blade-code/debug/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/echovic/blade-code/debug"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/echovic/blade-code/debug.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00005 | $0.00307 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00123 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00061 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00031 |
Grade A, and why
debug scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
请帮我分析以下错误。
错误信息
$ARGUMENTS
分析步骤
1. 错误分类
- 语法错误 / 运行时错误 / 类型错误 / 逻辑错误？
- 来自哪个模块？
2. 定位源头
- 从错误堆栈追溯
- 找到触发错误的代码
3. 上下文分析
- 阅读相关代码
- 理解预期行为
- 找出实际行为与预期的差异
4. 根因分析
- 为什么会发生这个错误？
- 什么条件触发了它？
5. 修复建议
- 提供具体的修复方案
- 说明修复原理
- 考虑边界情况
输出格式
🔍 错误类型：[类型]
📍 位置：[文件:行号]
🎯 根因：[简短描述]
📝 详细分析：
...
💡 修复建议：
1. ...
2. ...
⚠️ 注意事项：
- ...
如果需要更多信息来定位问题，请告诉我需要什么。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 62 lines · 5 tokens per session scan A c935c6e615fa
debug is a command published in the GitHub repository echoVic/blade-code (180 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 5 tokens to every session and 307 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.
implement
Execute the implementation plan by processing and executing all tasks defined in tasks.md.
speckit.bug.fix
Apply the remediation from a bug assessment and record what was changed.