Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/echovic/blade-code/debuggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/echoVic/blade-codeWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00307 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00153 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00001 | $0.00061 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00031 |
Grade A, and why
debug scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
请帮我分析以下错误。
错误信息
$ARGUMENTS
分析步骤
1. 错误分类
- 语法错误 / 运行时错误 / 类型错误 / 逻辑错误？
- 来自哪个模块？
2. 定位源头
- 从错误堆栈追溯
- 找到触发错误的代码
3. 上下文分析
- 阅读相关代码
- 理解预期行为
- 找出实际行为与预期的差异
4. 根因分析
- 为什么会发生这个错误？
- 什么条件触发了它？
5. 修复建议
- 提供具体的修复方案
- 说明修复原理
- 考虑边界情况
输出格式
🔍 错误类型：[类型]
📍 位置：[文件:行号]
🎯 根因：[简短描述]
📝 详细分析：
...
💡 修复建议：
1. ...
2. ...
⚠️ 注意事项：
- ...
如果需要更多信息来定位问题，请告诉我需要什么。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 62 lines · 5 tokens per session scan A c935c6e615fa
debug is a command published in the GitHub repository echoVic/blade-code (177 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 5 tokens to every session and 307 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
improve-prompt
Analyze and enhance vague or incomplete prompts before execution.
commit
Create well-structured git commits with meaningful messages.
explain-code
Break down complex code into clear, understandable explanations.
refactor
Analyze code and suggest meaningful refactoring improvements.
review-code
Perform a thorough code review on the specified files or recent changes.
awesome-chatgpt
Search awesome-ChatGPT-repositories for open-source GitHub repositories related to ChatGPT and LLMs.