Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/echovic/blade-code/reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/echoVic/blade-codeWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00298 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00149 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00001 | $0.00060 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00030 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
请对以下变更进行代码审查。
变更范围
$ARGUMENTS
当前 Diff
!`git diff $ARGUMENTS 2>/dev/null || git diff`
审查要点
请从以下维度进行审查：
1. 代码质量
- 命名是否清晰
- 函数是否过长
- 是否有重复代码
- 是否符合 SOLID 原则
2. 潜在 Bug
- 边界条件处理
- 空值检查
- 类型安全
- 并发问题
3. 安全性
- 输入验证
- SQL 注入
- XSS 风险
- 敏感信息暴露
4. 性能
- 不必要的循环
- 内存泄漏
- N+1 查询
- 大对象拷贝
5. 可维护性
- 注释是否充分
- 测试覆盖
- 错误处理
请给出具体的改进建议，并标注优先级（🔴 高 / 🟡 中 / 🟢 低）。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 57 lines · 6 tokens per session scan A 2b55346081ea
review is a command published in the GitHub repository echoVic/blade-code (177 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 6 tokens to every session and 298 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
improve-prompt
Analyze and enhance vague or incomplete prompts before execution.
commit
Create well-structured git commits with meaningful messages.
explain-code
Break down complex code into clear, understandable explanations.
refactor
Analyze code and suggest meaningful refactoring improvements.
review-code
Perform a thorough code review on the specified files or recent changes.
awesome-chatgpt
Search awesome-ChatGPT-repositories for open-source GitHub repositories related to ChatGPT and LLMs.