Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/echovic/blade-code/testgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/echoVic/blade-codeWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00299 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00150 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00001 | $0.00060 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00030 |
Grade A, and why
test scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
请运行测试并分析结果。
测试范围
$ARGUMENTS
执行测试
如果指定了测试范围，运行特定测试；否则运行全部测试。
分析要求
- 运行测试：执行
npm test $ARGUMENTS或npx vitest $ARGUMENTS - 分析结果：
- 如果全部通过 ✅，给出简短总结
- 如果有失败 ❌，详细分析原因
- 失败分析：
- 定位失败的测试用例
- 阅读相关源代码
- 找出问题根因
- 提供修复建议
输出格式
📊 测试结果：X passed, Y failed, Z skipped
✅ 通过的测试模块
- module1.test.ts (10 tests)
- module2.test.ts (5 tests)
❌ 失败的测试
- module3.test.ts > should handle edge case
原因：...
建议：...
如果有失败的测试，请询问我是否需要你来修复。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 51 lines · 6 tokens per session scan A 9950d24c284b
test is a command published in the GitHub repository echoVic/blade-code (177 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 6 tokens to every session and 299 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
improve-prompt
Analyze and enhance vague or incomplete prompts before execution.
commit
Create well-structured git commits with meaningful messages.
explain-code
Break down complex code into clear, understandable explanations.
refactor
Analyze code and suggest meaningful refactoring improvements.
review-code
Perform a thorough code review on the specified files or recent changes.
awesome-chatgpt
Search awesome-ChatGPT-repositories for open-source GitHub repositories related to ChatGPT and LLMs.