Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/edenbuilds/arya-aiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/edenbuilds/arya-ai/assess-specific-performance)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/edenbuilds/arya-ai/assess-specific-performance"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/edenbuilds/arya-ai/assess-specific-performance.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00011 | $0.01562 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00781 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00312 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00156 |
Grade A, and why
assess-specific-performance scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- assess-specific-performance — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 161 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/assess-specific-performance - Specific Performance Viability Command
Description
Analyze specific performance availability for contract under Specific Relief Act, 1963 (as amended 2018).
Usage
/assess-specific-performance [contract-type] [brief-facts]
Prompt Expansion
You are the specific-relief-specialist agent. Assess specific performance viability using IL-SRA-001 protocol.
CRITICAL: 2018 AMENDMENT CHANGED THE LAW
- Pre-2018: Discretionary ("may" grant)
- Post-2018: Mandatory ("SHALL" grant) unless exception
SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS:
-
CONTRACT VALIDITY (Threshold)
- Valid contract under Indian Contract Act? [Yes/No]
- Essential elements present? (Offer, acceptance, consideration, capacity, consent, lawful object)
- In writing (if required by law)? [e.g., immovable property - Section 54 TP Act]
- If NO → Specific performance not available (fix contract first)
-
POST-2018 DEFAULT RULE (Section 11A SRA) ✓ ALL contracts are specifically enforceable UNLESS:
- Sections 11, 14, 16 exceptions, OR
- Section 20 discretionary bars
Burden is on DEFENDANT to prove exception (not plaintiff to prove entitlement)
-
EXCEPTIONS - CHECK EACH (Section 14) Does contract fall into:
□ Section 14(1)(a): Goods with market value easily ascertainable
- Standard, fungible goods? [Yes/No]
- Unique/rare/not easily available? [Yes/No]
- If easily replaceable in market → Damages adequate → No specific performance
□ Section 14(1)(b): Personal service
- Employment contract? Professional services?
- Violates Article 23 Constitution (involuntary servitude)
- Exception: Infrastructure/construction (not purely personal)
□ Section 14(1)(c): Constant supervision required
- Does performance need daily/continuous supervision?
- Court cannot effectively supervise?
- Modern trend: Courts more willing (appoint commissioner, use Section 20(2) substituted performance)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 161 lines · 11 tokens per session scan A 8d973f02cc20
assess-specific-performance is a command published in the GitHub repository edenbuilds/arya-ai (3 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 11 tokens to every session and 1,562 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
deps-audit
Audit project dependencies for vulnerabilities, outdated packages, license conflicts, and supply chain risks — then provide actionable remediation strategies.
review-epo-claims
Analyze patent claims for EPO Art. 84 EPC compliance - clarity, conciseness, support by description.
voice-compliance
Voice/telephony compliance check — invokes voice-ai-reviewer to produce TM-voice-{slug}.md with TCPA, STIR/SHAKEN, state recording-consent, EU AI Act Art. 50, and synth-voice deepfake-law gaps.
review-policy
Review a policy document for structure, coverage, and language quality.
at-dsgvo
You are helping an enterprise architect generate an Austrian Data Protection Assessment — the Austrian-specific GDPR layer applied by the Datenschutzbehörde (DSB) under the Datenschutzgesetz (DSG 2018, BGBl. I Nr. 165/1999 as amended). Run this after /arckit:eu-rgpd to add Austrian obligations that go beyond the EU…
au-pspf
You are an enterprise architect generating a Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) compliance assessment for an Australian Government entity or contractor handling government information.