Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/edenbuilds/arya-aiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/edenbuilds/arya-ai/consumer-complaint)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/edenbuilds/arya-ai/consumer-complaint"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/edenbuilds/arya-ai/consumer-complaint.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00001 | $0.00750 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00375 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00150 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00075 |
Grade A, and why
consumer-complaint scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- consumer-complaint — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 88 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/consumer-complaint - Consumer Dispute Analysis
Description
Determine consumer status, assess defect/deficiency/unfair trade practice, and guide filing complaint with consumer commission or CCPA.
Usage
/consumer-complaint [transaction-details] [issue-description]
Prompt Expansion
You are the consumer-law-specialist agent. Analyze using IL-CONSUMER-001 protocol.
TRANSACTION: [User's transaction details] ISSUE: [User's complaint]
CONSUMER STATUS DETERMINATION (Section 2(7)):
- Goods/Services bought for consideration: ✓
- Purpose: ☐ Self-consumption (personal/household use) → CONSUMER ✅ ☐ Earning livelihood through self-employment → CONSUMER ✅ ☐ Commercial resale → NOT CONSUMER ❌ ☐ Commercial manufacturing → NOT CONSUMER ❌
PRECEDENT: Laxmi Engineering Works v. P.S.G. Industrial Institute (1995 SC)
CONCLUSION: ✅ CONSUMER / ❌ NOT CONSUMER
IF CONSUMER:
COMPLAINT CLASSIFICATION:
- DEFECT IN GOODS (Section 2(10)): Fault, imperfection in quality/quantity/purity/standard
- DEFICIENCY IN SERVICES (Section 2(11)): Inadequacy in quality, nature, manner of service
- UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICE (Section 2(47)):
- False representation (quality, sponsorship, approval)
- Misleading advertisement
- Bait advertising
- False gift/prize offers
- Withholding material information
RELIEF SOUGHT:
- Removal of defect
- Replacement of goods
- Refund of price paid
- Compensation for loss/injury
- Discontinuance of unfair practice
- Penalty
JURISDICTION (Pecuniary):
- Value ≤ ₹1 crore → DISTRICT COMMISSION
- Value > ₹1 crore ≤ ₹10 crore → STATE COMMISSION
- Value > ₹10 crore → NATIONAL COMMISSION
EVIDENCE REQUIRED:
- Purchase receipt/invoice ✓
- Warranty/guarantee card
- Correspondence with seller/manufacturer
- Photos/videos of defect
- Expert reports (if technical defect)
FILING PROCEDURE:
- Complaint in prescribed form
- Court fee (nominal ₹100-500)
- Submit to appropriate commission (District/State/National based on value)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 88 lines · 1 tokens per session scan A 0522d14a67a1
consumer-complaint is a command published in the GitHub repository edenbuilds/arya-ai (3 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 1 tokens to every session and 750 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
deps-audit
Audit project dependencies for vulnerabilities, outdated packages, license conflicts, and supply chain risks — then provide actionable remediation strategies.
review-epo-claims
Analyze patent claims for EPO Art. 84 EPC compliance - clarity, conciseness, support by description.
voice-compliance
Voice/telephony compliance check — invokes voice-ai-reviewer to produce TM-voice-{slug}.md with TCPA, STIR/SHAKEN, state recording-consent, EU AI Act Art. 50, and synth-voice deepfake-law gaps.
review-policy
Review a policy document for structure, coverage, and language quality.
at-dsgvo
You are helping an enterprise architect generate an Austrian Data Protection Assessment — the Austrian-specific GDPR layer applied by the Datenschutzbehörde (DSB) under the Datenschutzgesetz (DSG 2018, BGBl. I Nr. 165/1999 as amended). Run this after /arckit:eu-rgpd to add Austrian obligations that go beyond the EU…
au-pspf
You are an enterprise architect generating a Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) compliance assessment for an Australian Government entity or contractor handling government information.