Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/edenbuilds/arya-aiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/edenbuilds/arya-ai/contract-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/edenbuilds/arya-ai/contract-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/edenbuilds/arya-ai/contract-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/edenbuilds/arya-ai/contract-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/edenbuilds/arya-ai/contract-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00003 | $0.02321 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00002 | $0.01161 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00001 | $0.00464 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00232 |
Grade A, and why
contract-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- contract-review — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 242 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Contract Review Command
Task: Comprehensive legal review of existing contracts or specific clauses for validity, enforceability, risks, and compliance.
Workflow
-
Input Contract:
- User provides contract text or specific clause
- Or describes clause verbally
-
Identify Contract Type and Stage:
- Type (sale, service, guarantee, bailment, agency, partnership, other)
- Stage (draft, executed, performance ongoing, disputed)
-
Load Relevant Protocols:
- Formation protocols (IL-CONTRACT-FORMATION, IL-CONTRACT-CAPACITY, IL-CONTRACT-FREE-CONSENT, IL-CONTRACT-LEGALITY)
- Special contract protocols (based on type)
- Remedies protocols (if breach/dispute context)
-
Systematic Review Framework:
A. Validity Check (Section 10 Elements):
- ✓/✗ Parties: Identified, capacity verified (not minor, unsound mind)
- ✓/✗ Offer and Acceptance: Clear, unconditional, communicated
- ✓/✗ Consideration: Present (Rs. amount stated), past/present/future, real
- ✓/✗ Free Consent: No coercion, fraud, misrepresentation, undue influence, mistake
- ✓/✗ Lawful Object: Section 23 compliance (not forbidden, fraudulent, immoral, opposed to public policy)
- ✓/✗ Not Expressly Void: Section 26-30 (restraint of marriage, trade, legal proceedings, wagering, uncertainty)
- ✓/✗ Certainty: Section 29 (terms definite and ascertainable)
- ✓/✗ Possibility: Performance possible
B. Clause-Specific Analysis:
Restraint Clauses (Section 27):
- Non-compete: Post-employment void (Niranjan Shankar Golikari); during employment if reasonable
- Sale of goodwill exception: Reasonable restraint valid
- Geographic/time limits: Reasonableness assessment
Liquidated Damages (Section 74):
- Genuine pre-estimate or penalty? (Indian law: both enforceable as ceiling)
- Reasonable amount? (Kailash Nath Associates: genuine pre-estimate upheld)
- Effect: Court awards reasonable compensation not exceeding stipulated
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 242 lines · 3 tokens per session scan A ea0fdec2527e
contract-review is a command published in the GitHub repository edenbuilds/arya-ai (3 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 3 tokens to every session and 2,321 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
deps-audit
Audit project dependencies for vulnerabilities, outdated packages, license conflicts, and supply chain risks — then provide actionable remediation strategies.
review-epo-claims
Analyze patent claims for EPO Art. 84 EPC compliance - clarity, conciseness, support by description.
voice-compliance
Voice/telephony compliance check — invokes voice-ai-reviewer to produce TM-voice-{slug}.md with TCPA, STIR/SHAKEN, state recording-consent, EU AI Act Art. 50, and synth-voice deepfake-law gaps.
review-policy
Review a policy document for structure, coverage, and language quality.
at-dsgvo
You are helping an enterprise architect generate an Austrian Data Protection Assessment — the Austrian-specific GDPR layer applied by the Datenschutzbehörde (DSB) under the Datenschutzgesetz (DSG 2018, BGBl. I Nr. 165/1999 as amended). Run this after /arckit:eu-rgpd to add Austrian obligations that go beyond the EU…
au-pspf
You are an enterprise architect generating a Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) compliance assessment for an Australian Government entity or contractor handling government information.