Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/edenbuilds/arya-aiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/edenbuilds/arya-ai/practice-lawyer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/edenbuilds/arya-ai/practice-lawyer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/edenbuilds/arya-ai/practice-lawyer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/edenbuilds/arya-ai/practice-lawyer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/edenbuilds/arya-ai/practice-lawyer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00053 | $0.05243 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.02622 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.01049 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00524 |
Grade A, and why
practice-lawyer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- practice-lawyer — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 607 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Command: Universal Litigation Practice Simulator
Purpose
Interactive mock court practice across ALL legal domains (labour, consumer, civil, writ petitions, criminal) with AI judge, opposing counsel, and witnesses. Provides realistic court simulations, performance feedback, and skill development for lawyers, law students, and aspiring litigators.
Usage
/practice-lawyer [domain] [case-type] [difficulty]
Parameters:
domain: labour | consumer | civil | writ | criminal | propertycase-type: Specific case within domain (e.g., wrongful-termination, rera-complaint, mandamus)difficulty: easy (70% win rate) | medium (50% win rate) | hard (30% win rate)
What This Command Does
1. Generates Realistic Case Scenario
Creates fact pattern with:
- Background facts (employment details, transaction details, dispute history)
- Legal issues (what needs to be proven/defended)
- Evidence available (documents, witnesses)
- Procedural posture (first hearing, evidence stage, arguments stage)
- Your role (applicant's counsel OR respondent's counsel)
2. AI Court Simulation
AI Judge: Adapts behavior to court type
- Labour Court: Patient, worker-friendly, less formal ("Your Honour")
- Consumer Forum: Semi-formal, pro-consumer bias
- High Court: Very formal, strict, interventionist ("My Lord")
- Civil Court: Moderately formal, neutral
AI Opposing Counsel: Domain-appropriate strategies
- Labour: Employer's lawyer (attacks worker credibility, claims misconduct proven)
- Consumer: Company's lawyer (claims no deficiency, buyer's contributory negligence)
- Writ: Government's lawyer (cites alternative remedy, questions locus standi)
- Civil: Defendant's lawyer (denies breach, claims force majeure)
AI Witnesses: Realistic responses
- Evasive witnesses ("I don't remember")
- Hostile witnesses (defensive, argumentative)
- Cooperative witnesses (answer clearly)
- Expert witnesses (technical testimony)
3. Interactive Practice Modes
- Cross-Examination Practice: Question opposing party's witnesses
- Examination-in-Chief Practice: Elicit testimony from your client
- Argument Practice: Opening statements, final arguments, rebuttals
- Objection Handling: Respond to opposing counsel's objections
- Settlement Negotiation: Practice mediation, conciliation
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 607 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 382526301049
practice-lawyer is a command published in the GitHub repository edenbuilds/arya-ai (3 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 5,243 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
concept
Teach one GRC engineering concept in plain language.
scenario
Generate a fictional scenario and grade the learner's response.
translate
Translate an adjacent-domain pattern into a GRC learning frame.
practice-labour-case
Command "practice-labour-case" from shashionline/indian-law-plugin, covering purpose, usage, what this command does, example usage and example 1: practice cross-examination (medium difficulty).
review-epo-claims
Analyze patent claims for EPO Art. 84 EPC compliance - clarity, conciseness, support by description.
start-10-1
A guided lesson on setting up clasp, a command-line tool for managing Google Apps Script projects, and connecting it to Google’s Apps Script API.