Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/elchika-inc/ts-review-graphWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/elchika-inc/ts-review-graph/impact)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/elchika-inc/ts-review-graph/impact"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/elchika-inc/ts-review-graph/impact/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/elchika-inc/ts-review-graph/impact"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/elchika-inc/ts-review-graph/impact.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00030 | $0.00148 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00074 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00030 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00015 |
Grade A, and why
ts-review-graph:impact scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Arguments: <type_name_or_file>
If the argument ends with .ts or .tsx, call get_impact with changed_file: <argument>.
Otherwise, call get_type_usages with type_name: <argument>.
Display the result clearly.
When a dependency graph is requested, call get_impact with
changed_file: <argument> and format: "mermaid". Display the returned
Mermaid fence without removing it so GitHub-compatible renderers can draw the graph.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 16 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A a0f61b501c1e
ts-review-graph:impact is a command published in the GitHub repository elchika-inc/ts-review-graph (0 stars, last pushed 23d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 148 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
types
Debug and fix TypeScript type errors with systematic analysis and expert guidance.
setup-code-intelligence
Check code-intelligence prerequisites (ripgrep + a language server) and print install hints.
type-crusade
Unleash parallel TypeScript Purist agents to purge every any, as cast, and type sin across the codebase. No type sin survives.
typescript
Apply TypeScript best practices and coding standards.
types
Run bun run typecheck or tsc or npx tsc and fix all type errors.
format
Auto-format code and fix TypeScript issues.