Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/emaraschio/cursor-commandsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/emaraschio/cursor-commands/lint-fix)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/emaraschio/cursor-commands/lint-fix"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/emaraschio/cursor-commands/lint-fix/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/emaraschio/cursor-commands/lint-fix"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/emaraschio/cursor-commands/lint-fix.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00011 | $0.00389 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00156 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00078 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00039 |
Grade A, and why
lint-fix scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Overview
Fix lint issues in the current file. Full workflow: .cursor/skill-contracts/lint-fix/SKILL.md (user install: ~/.cursor/skill-contracts/lint-fix/SKILL.md).
Defaults
None. See skill for workflow defaults.
Steps
- Read
.cursor/skill-contracts/lint-fix/SKILL.mdfor the full agent contract; if that file is missing, read~/.cursor/skill-contracts/lint-fix/SKILL.md. - Execute the workflow in order; do not skip safety steps.
- Report outcomes per skill (summary, tables, or checklist as specified).
Anti-patterns
- Do not change behavior while fixing style. Trigger: a lint fix that tempts a logic tweak. Wrong: altering runtime behavior under cover of a style fix. Correct: limit edits to formatting and style, leaving behavior unchanged. Reason: behavior changes hidden in a lint pass bypass review and can introduce regressions.
- Use the project linter config. Trigger: the repo ships its own linter configuration. Wrong: applying personal rules or a different formatter. Correct: run the project's configured linter and follow its rules. Reason: ad hoc rules create churn and conflict with the agreed project style.
Examples
/lint-fix
Maintainers
Behavioral eval: .cursor/skill-contracts/lint-fix/eval/cases.md. Ship gate sections: A before changing SKILL.md or this command.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 38 lines · 11 tokens per session scan A 710f83ffe59a
lint-fix is a command published in the GitHub repository emaraschio/cursor-commands (9 stars, last pushed 18d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 11 tokens to every session and 389 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
fix-issue
Fetch a GitHub issue, find the relevant code, implement the fix, verify, and open a PR.
feedback-to-closure
Turn raw feedback (reports, Sentry, reviews, QA/audit findings) into deduplicated durable tickets and drive each to production-verified closure.
deadcode
Find dead code with a configured Knip baseline, then delete it by category behind a ratchet.
deadcode-plan
Dead-code audit — configured Knip baseline plus ratchet plan, delete nothing until approved.
debug-issue
Hypothesis-driven debugging with runtime evidence before a fix — not guessing.
error-plan
Error-handling & observability audit (Sentry + Langfuse) — plan only, no fixes until approved.