Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/engineerwithai/engineerwith-agents/code-explaingit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/EngineerWithAI/engineerwith-agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/engineerwithai/engineerwith-agents/code-explain)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/engineerwithai/engineerwith-agents/code-explain"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/engineerwithai/engineerwith-agents/code-explain.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.05013 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.02507 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.01003 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00501 |
Grade A, and why
code-explain scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
94% identical to code-explain — 256 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 808 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Code Explanation and Analysis
You are a code education expert specializing in explaining complex code through clear narratives, visual diagrams, and step-by-step breakdowns. Transform difficult concepts into understandable explanations for developers at all levels.
Context
The user needs help understanding complex code sections, algorithms, design patterns, or system architectures. Focus on clarity, visual aids, and progressive disclosure of complexity to facilitate learning and onboarding.
Requirements
$ARGUMENTS
Instructions
1. Code Comprehension Analysis
Analyze the code to determine complexity and structure:
Code Complexity Assessment
import ast
import re
from typing import Dict, List, Tuple
class CodeAnalyzer:
def analyze_complexity(self, code: str) -> Dict:
"""
Analyze code complexity and structure
"""
analysis = {
'complexity_score': 0,
'concepts': [],
'patterns': [],
'dependencies': [],
'difficulty_level': 'beginner'
}
# Parse code structure
try:
tree = ast.parse(code)
# Analyze complexity metrics
analysis['metrics'] = {
'lines_of_code': len(code.splitlines()),
'cyclomatic_complexity': self._calculate_cyclomatic_complexity(tree),
'nesting_depth': self._calculate_max_nesting(tree),
'function_count': len([n for n in ast.walk(tree) if isinstance(n, ast.FunctionDef)]),
'class_count': len([n for n in ast.walk(tree) if isinstance(n, ast.ClassDef)])
}
# Identify concepts used
analysis['concepts'] = self._identify_concepts(tree)
# Detect design patterns
analysis['patterns'] = self._detect_patterns(tree)
# Extract dependencies
analysis['dependencies'] = self._extract_dependencies(tree)
# Determine difficulty level
analysis['difficulty_level'] = self._assess_difficulty(analysis)
except SyntaxError as e:
analysis['parse_error'] = str(e)
return analysis
def _identify_concepts(self, tree) -> List[str]:
"""
Identify programming concepts used in the code
"""
concepts = []
for node in ast.walk(tree):
# Async/await
if isinstance(node, (ast.AsyncFunctionDef, ast.AsyncWith, ast.AsyncFor)):
concepts.append('asynchronous programming')
# Decorators
elif isinstance(node, ast.FunctionDef) and node.decorator_list:
concepts.append('decorators')
# Context managers
elif isinstance(node, ast.With):
concepts.append('context managers')
# Generators
elif isinstance(node, ast.Yield):
concepts.append('generators')
# List/Dict/Set comprehensions
elif isinstance(node, (ast.ListComp, ast.DictComp, ast.SetComp)):
concepts.append('comprehensions')
# Lambda functions
elif isinstance(node, ast.Lambda):
concepts.append('lambda functions')
# Exception handling
elif isinstance(node, ast.Try):
concepts.append('exception handling')
return list(set(concepts))
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 808 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 19b50681498f
code-explain is a command published in the GitHub repository EngineerWithAI/engineerwith-agents (4 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 5,013 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 94% identical to code-explain, differing in 256 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
review
Cold re-quiz on code that already shipped — your own session commits, not the change in front of you.
learn-story-flow
Learn story-flow concepts with interactive guidance for junior developers.
annex-a-deep-dive
Deep dive analysis of ISO 27001 Annex A control domains with implementation guidance.
start-10-1
Command "start-10-1" from minicoohei/ai-agent-camp, covering 🎓 lesson 10-1: clasp基本・gasプロジェクト管理, 📍 このセッションでやること, 🎯 準備チェック, 🚀 step 1: claspのインストールと apps script api の確認 and 🚀 step 2: google認証.
start-13-4.en
Welcome to Lesson 13-4: Landing Page Implementation!
start-0-8
AIが自動実行: uv run python tools/setupprogress.py show を実行して現在のセットアップ進捗を表示する。.