obsidian-panel

obsidian-panel is a command for Claude Code from eugeniughelbur/obsidian-second-brain. It costs 32 tokens per session (782 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A decision-review command that asks several independent viewpoints to assess the same question, then combines their conclusions.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review a choice through advisor notes or four viewpoints: skeptic, customer, operator, and long-term planner.
Why use it?
It helps reveal disagreements, overlooked risks, and different priorities before you commit to a decision.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the obsidian-second-brain plugin — 1 skill, 47 commands, 3 hooks shipped together

Good fit Use it to review a choice through advisor notes or four viewpoints: skeptic, customer, operator, and long-term planner.

Compare 6 commands from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/eugeniughelbur/obsidian-second-brain/obsidian-panel
About the project

obsidian-second-brain turns an Obsidian vault into persistent, searchable memory for Claude Code and other command-line coding agents, storing knowledge as linked Markdown notes. It is for developers, founders, writers, and researchers who want agents to retain project context across sessions. Its catalogue entries provide commands, hooks, a plugin, a skill, and instructions for capturing, finding, and maintaining that memory.

eugeniughelbur/obsidian-second-brain · 4,376 stars · on GitHub · eugeniughelbur.github.io

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/eugeniughelbur/obsidian-second-brain

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install obsidian-second-brain, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 1 skill, 47 commands, 3 hooks.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for obsidian-panel

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/eugeniughelbur/obsidian-second-brain/obsidian-panel/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/eugeniughelbur/obsidian-second-brain/obsidian-panel)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/eugeniughelbur/obsidian-second-brain/obsidian-panel"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/eugeniughelbur/obsidian-second-brain/obsidian-panel/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for obsidian-panel

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/eugeniughelbur/obsidian-second-brain/obsidian-panel"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/eugeniughelbur/obsidian-second-brain/obsidian-panel.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 32 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 782 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00032 $0.00782
Opus 5 $0.00016 $0.00391
Sonnet 5 $0.00006 $0.00156
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00078

Measured 10d ago against content hash adc46e8d9c7c, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-10, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

obsidian-panel scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

commands/obsidian-panel.md · 27 lines

What it actually says

Use the obsidian-second-brain skill. Execute /obsidian-panel [decision or question]:

Pressure-tests a decision from several independent angles at once. Where /obsidian-challenge red-teams from one adversarial stance, this gathers a panel of distinct lenses and makes each argue on its own before you see a synthesis.

  1. Resolve the decision/question from the argument. If none, ask what to put to the panel.
  2. Choose the panel:
    • If the vault has an Advisors/ folder, read those persona notes and use each as a panelist (each verdict reflects that advisor's stated lens and priorities).
    • Otherwise, use 4 generic lenses: the skeptic (what breaks this), the user/customer (who is served or hurt), the operator (can this actually be run/maintained), and the long-game (what does this look like in a year).
  3. For EACH panelist, write an independent verdict: their position, the strongest reason behind it, and what would change their mind. Keep them genuinely distinct - do not let them converge prematurely.
  4. Write a synthesis: where the panel agreed, where it split, and a recommended decision with its main risk. Do not hide the disagreement - the split is the most useful output.
  5. Save to the concepts folder (resolved per references/folder-map.md - wiki-style wiki/concepts/, Obsidian-style Ideas/) as YYYY-MM-DD - panel - <slug>.md (type: synthesis, tagged [synthesis, thinking, panel]), linking any [[Advisors/...]] notes and [[entities/projects]] the decision touches. Cross-link from today's daily note.

AI-first rule: Every note created or updated by this command MUST follow references/ai-first-rules.md - ## For future agent preamble, rich frontmatter (type, date, tags, ai-first: true, plus type-specific fields), recency markers per external claim, mandatory [[wikilinks]] for every person/project/concept referenced, sources preserved verbatim with URLs inline, and confidence levels where applicable. If that path does not resolve from your working directory, search upward for it; if you still cannot read it, say so before writing rather than producing a note that silently skips the rule. The vault is for future agent retrieval - not human reading.

Anti-fabrication: If you use Advisors/ notes, base each verdict on what that note actually says - do not invent an advisor's position or attribute views to a real person they have not expressed. Never fabricate a consensus; report the real split. See the anti-fabrication and search-completeness hard rules in references/ai-first-rules.md.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 10d ago First seen · 27 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A adc46e8d9c7c

Subscribe to this mod's changes

obsidian-panel is a command published in the GitHub repository eugeniughelbur/obsidian-second-brain (4,376 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 782 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.