obsidian-review

obsidian-review is a command for Claude Code from eugeniughelbur/obsidian-second-brain. It costs 11 tokens per session (667 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A command for creating a weekly or monthly review note from an Obsidian vault, a folder of linked notes and records. It reads daily notes, development logs, projects, and completed tasks.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review what happened during a week or month, track project changes, record accomplishments, and save the result in the vault’s reviews folder.
Why use it?
It gathers information spread across many notes into one structured summary. It also highlights decisions, lessons, changes, and follow-up questions that might otherwise be missed.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: $ARGUMENTS substitution.

Part of the obsidian-second-brain plugin — 1 skill, 47 commands, 3 hooks shipped together

Good fit Use it to review what happened during a week or month, track project changes, record accomplishments, and save the result in the vault’s reviews folder.

Compare 6 commands from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/eugeniughelbur/obsidian-second-brain/obsidian-review
About the project

obsidian-second-brain turns an Obsidian vault into persistent, searchable memory for Claude Code and other command-line coding agents, storing knowledge as linked Markdown notes. It is for developers, founders, writers, and researchers who want agents to retain project context across sessions. Its catalogue entries provide commands, hooks, a plugin, a skill, and instructions for capturing, finding, and maintaining that memory.

eugeniughelbur/obsidian-second-brain · 4,392 stars · on GitHub · eugeniughelbur.github.io

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/eugeniughelbur/obsidian-second-brain

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install obsidian-second-brain, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 1 skill, 47 commands, 3 hooks.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for obsidian-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/eugeniughelbur/obsidian-second-brain/obsidian-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/eugeniughelbur/obsidian-second-brain/obsidian-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/eugeniughelbur/obsidian-second-brain/obsidian-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/eugeniughelbur/obsidian-second-brain/obsidian-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for obsidian-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/eugeniughelbur/obsidian-second-brain/obsidian-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/eugeniughelbur/obsidian-second-brain/obsidian-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 11 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 667 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00011 $0.00667
Opus 5 $0.00005 $0.00333
Sonnet 5 $0.00002 $0.00133
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00067

Measured 11d ago against content hash 480a71ff0e00, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

obsidian-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

commands/obsidian-review.md · 34 lines

What it actually says

Use the obsidian-second-brain skill. Execute /obsidian-review $ARGUMENTS:

The optional argument specifies weekly or monthly. Ask if not clear from context.

  1. Read _CLAUDE.md first if it exists in the vault root
  2. Determine the period: weekly or monthly
  3. Read daily notes and dev logs for the period
  4. Read active projects and check for status changes
  5. Read completed tasks from kanban boards
  6. Draft a review note using Templates/Review.md (or lowercase templates/Review.md) if one exists, otherwise use:
    • What I accomplished
    • Key decisions made
    • People I worked with
    • What I learned
    • What to carry forward
    • Suggested questions for future agent - 4 to 5 questions this period's vault content can answer that the user has not asked yet. Each question must cite at least one specific note (with [[wikilink]]). Prefer questions that surface contradictions across notes, connect entities that co-appeared without being explicitly linked, or name an unstated next action. Skip generic prompts the review section already covers.
  7. Save to the reviews folder resolved per references/folder-map.md (read the vault's _CLAUDE.md Folder Map first; wiki-style wiki/reviews/, Obsidian-style Reviews/), named YYYY-MM-DD - Weekly Review.md (or Monthly)
  8. Link from the last daily note of the period

AI-first rule: Every note created or updated by this command MUST follow references/ai-first-rules.md - ## For future agent preamble, rich frontmatter (type, date, tags, ai-first: true, plus type-specific fields), recency markers per external claim, mandatory [[wikilinks]] for every person/project/concept referenced, sources preserved verbatim with URLs inline, and confidence levels where applicable. If that path does not resolve from your working directory, search upward for it; if you still cannot read it, say so before writing rather than producing a note that silently skips the rule. The vault is for future agent retrieval - not human reading.

Anti-fabrication: Search exhaustively before claiming any note, person, or file is absent - false absence is the most common failure mode - and never invent facts, entities, or dates (mark unknowns as TBD). See the anti-fabrication and search-completeness hard rules in references/ai-first-rules.md.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago First seen · 34 lines · 11 tokens per session scan A 480a71ff0e00

Subscribe to this mod's changes

obsidian-review is a command published in the GitHub repository eugeniughelbur/obsidian-second-brain (4,392 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 11 tokens to every session and 667 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.