Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/evangelosmeklis/thufir/analyze-gitlabgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/evangelosmeklis/thufirWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/evangelosmeklis/thufir/analyze-gitlab)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/evangelosmeklis/thufir/analyze-gitlab"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/evangelosmeklis/thufir/analyze-gitlab.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00020 | $0.02046 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.01023 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00409 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00205 |
Grade A, and why
analyze-gitlab scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 290 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Analyze GitLab Issue Command
Purpose
Investigate a GitLab issue reporting a production problem by fetching issue details, extracting error information, searching the codebase for related code, analyzing git history, and generating a root cause analysis report.
Instructions for Claude
When this command is invoked, perform comprehensive root cause analysis for a GitLab issue:
Step 1: Gather Issue Information
If user provided issue IID (internal ID):
- Read settings from
.claude/thufir.local.mdto get default project - Use gitlab MCP tool to fetch issue details:
- Tool:
gitlab_get_issue - Parameters:
{issue_iid: <iid>}
- Tool:
If user provided issue URL:
- Parse URL to extract group, project, and issue IID
- Use gitlab MCP tool with parsed values
If no argument provided:
- Use AskUserQuestion to ask:
- "What is the GitLab issue number (IID)?"
- Or "What project? (leave blank for default from settings)"
Extract from issue:
- Issue IID and title
- Description
- Labels (look for "production", "incident", "priority::1", "bug")
- Created/updated timestamps
- Comments/notes (read for additional context)
- Assignees
- Related merge requests mentioned
- Milestones
Step 2: Parse Error Information
From issue description and comments, extract:
-
Error messages:
- Stack traces
- Error names (e.g., "ConnectionPoolExhausted")
- Error codes (500, 503, timeout, etc.)
-
Reproduction details:
- Steps to reproduce
- Affected features or endpoints
- User actions that trigger error
-
Impact information:
- When error first occurred (timestamp)
- How many users affected
- Frequency (one-time, intermittent, constant)
- Geographic or segment-specific
-
System context:
- Service or component mentioned
- Environment (production, staging)
- Browser or client information
Parse patterns like:
- "Users are getting 500 errors..."
- "Error: ConnectionPoolExhausted at 14:32 UTC"
- "Stack trace: ..."
- "Approximately 15,000 users affected"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 290 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A c11676009c04
analyze-gitlab is a command published in the GitHub repository evangelosmeklis/thufir (7 stars, last pushed 8mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 2,046 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.
implement
Execute the implementation plan by processing and executing all tasks defined in tasks.md.