Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/evolution-foundation/evo-nexusWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/evolution-foundation/evo-nexus/lex-legal)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/evolution-foundation/evo-nexus/lex-legal"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/evolution-foundation/evo-nexus/lex-legal/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/evolution-foundation/evo-nexus/lex-legal"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/evolution-foundation/evo-nexus/lex-legal.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00063 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00032 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00013 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00006 |
Grade A, and why
lex-legal scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 4 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 2c931a9fdad2
lex-legal is a command published in the GitHub repository evolution-foundation/evo-nexus (532 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), with no licence file. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 63 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
legal-doc
Create a professional legal document for enterprise use.
produce-ci-finding
Package the peer-reviewed motive assessment as an ICD 203-compliant finding ready for the cognizant CI office, insider-threat hub, security adjudicator, or HR/legal recipient. This is the final step in the analytic chain. Run only after /peer-review-checklist has produced a passed sign-off block.
component-recall-screen
Screen the practice's patient cohort against component recall notices (FDA MAUDE field-action, manufacturer safety bulletins, EU MDR FSCA) — generate a prioritised action list with regulatory-reporting checkpoints.
check-exposure-compliance
Compare a survey's measurements against the applicable RF / LF exposure limit and produce a defensible compliance statement. Cites the standard verbatim; never paraphrases the limit formula.
custody-report
Verify the ledger's integrity end-to-end and export the full chain-of-custody dossier + committed diagnosis — the defensible artifact for a warranty claim, CARB referee, or fleet audit.
permit-packet
Assemble or audit a falconry permit application/renewal packet and the facility-inspection readiness checklist for the state wildlife agency.