Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/existential-birds/amelia/review-testsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/existential-birds/ameliaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/existential-birds/amelia/review-tests)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/existential-birds/amelia/review-tests"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/existential-birds/amelia/review-tests.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00078 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00039 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00016 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00008 |
Grade A, and why
review-tests scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
examine tests added as part of this pull request, ensure:
- they don't test library functionality or otherwise suffer from overengineering
- Parametrize tests to reduce lines of code where possible
- tests follow DRY
- tests are actually useful
ultrathink and use Agents
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 11 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A 055ef16423ce
review-tests is a command published in the GitHub repository existential-birds/amelia (21 stars, last pushed 24d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 78 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
Hexagonal.Gatekeeper
Your role is to perform a deep, architecture-focused code review on a specific branch. You must validate that all changes strictly follow Hexagonal Architecture (Ports & Adapters) principles and align with the existing codebase patterns.
PyTest.GateKeeper
You are a Senior QA Automation Engineer with deep expertise in Python testing and the pytest framework.
new-agent
Create a new AgentShip agent using the standard 2-file pattern.
digest
Generate a daily or weekly digest of activity across all connected sources.
start
Initialize the productivity system and open the dashboard.
update
Sync tasks and refresh memory from your current activity.