Expensify/App is the source code for New Expensify, a financial collaboration application organized around chat. It is used by contributors building and testing the web, iOS, and Android versions of the application. Catalogue add-ons support development workflows such as mobile testing and agent-assisted work on the codebase.
Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to Expensify/App. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Expensify/App/main/.claude/commands/review-helpdot-pr.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Expensify/AppWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/expensify/app/review-helpdot-pr)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/expensify/app/review-helpdot-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/expensify/app/review-helpdot-pr/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/expensify/app/review-helpdot-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/expensify/app/review-helpdot-pr.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00007 | $0.00271 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00108 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00054 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00027 |
Grade A, and why
review-helpdot-pr scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Perform a comprehensive HelpDot documentation review using two specialized subagents. Both reviewers use the help site governance files in the repo as the source of truth for rules and scoring:
- docs/HELPSITE_NAMING_CONVENTIONS.md — UI referencing, button/tab naming, navigation
- docs/HELP_AUTHORING_GUIDELINES.md — Structure, headings, metadata, AI retrieval, validation
- docs/TEMPLATE.md — YAML frontmatter, heading guidance, FAQ structure
Step 1: Inline Review
Use the helpdot-inline-reviewer agent to:
- Scan all changed documentation files
- Create inline comments for violations of the governance rules above
- Focus on line-specific, actionable feedback
Step 2: Summary Review
Use the helpdot-summary-reviewer agent to:
- Analyze the overall quality of all changes using the governance criteria
- Provide comprehensive assessment with scoring
- Post one top-level PR comment with summary and recommendations
Run both agents and ensure their feedback is posted to the PR.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 29 lines · 7 tokens per session scan A 92eb9c1f77da
review-helpdot-pr is a command published in the GitHub repository Expensify/App (5,081 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 7 tokens to every session and 271 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
refactor
Systematic code refactoring with smart scope detection.
review-branch
Review the current branch's diff against base by dispatching atomic-reviewer. No orchestration loop, no spec required — pre-flight before /commit pr or /commit merge.
init
Install the formatters this repository needs, with every command visible before it runs.
spec-trace-requirements
You are verifying that implementation changes trace back to specification requirements.
merge-conflict-analysis
You are analyzing merge conflicts for PR #${{ pr-number }}.
boot
Start a new PromptKit prompt assembly session (alias for /bootstrap).