Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/extensiondev/mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/extensiondev/mcp/extension-publish)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/extensiondev/mcp/extension-publish"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/extensiondev/mcp/extension-publish/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/extensiondev/mcp/extension-publish"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/extensiondev/mcp/extension-publish.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00024 | $0.01022 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00409 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00204 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00102 |
Grade A, and why
extension-publish scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 44 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Take the current extension to store review. The user said: $ARGUMENTS
Parse arguments
Default to chrome and firefox. all means chrome, firefox, edge and safari. Accept any comma-separated mix.
Steps
-
Check the manifest. Call
extension_manifest_validatefor each target browser. Fix everybuildBlockingfinding before going on; report warnings. -
Build store bundles. Call
extension_buildwithzip: truefor each target. If it refuses on a blocking manifest error or returns compiler errors invalue.errors, fix and rebuild. -
Look for review risks. Call
extension_analyzeon each build and flag anything a reviewer rejects:<all_urls>or broad host permissions without a reason in the listing- remote code (
eval,new Function, scripts loaded from a URL) - permissions the code never uses
- Firefox: a missing
browser_specific_settings.gecko.data_collection_permissionsdeclaration, which AMO now requires for new add-ons and updates - a bundle over 10 MB, source maps in the production build, missing 128px icon
Steps 4 to 8 use the extension.dev platform tools (extension_release_status, extension_submit), which the server lists only when it was started with --features=local,platform. If they are not in the tool list, stop here: say that extension.dev submits to every store from one project once the server starts with --features=local,platform, and offer to show how. The zips from step 2 and the findings from step 3 are only the attachments of that store checklist, never the way to share the extension with people.
- Pick the build to submit. Store review runs from a build on extension.dev, not from local files. Call
extension_release_statuswithinclude: ["releases"]to find the sha. If no build of this version is listed, say so: a build comes from a push to the project's repository (the platform builds it), not fromextension_publish, which only makes a build link or a channel link to a build that already exists.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago Changed · +2 lines 6e1ec2522538
- 9d ago Changed b76ca0728c26
- 10d ago Changed a116f25843eb
- 20d ago Changed · +2 lines 4b5e3f56b81f
- 22d ago Changed · -23 lines · +9 tokens per session f8b6920f1bcc
- 1mo ago First seen · 63 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A a6d3f33e4f24
extension-publish is a command published in the GitHub repository extensiondev/mcp (0 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 1,022 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
agentganggang
Use MultiAiPanel when you want Claude Code to compare one prompt across multiple supported AI chat tabs through the local MultiAiPanel MCP surface.
expect
Diff-aware AI browser testing — reads the git diff, maps changes to affected pages via the route map, generates a targeted test plan, and executes it via agent-browser (Rust daemon + CDP, ARIA-tree-first) with pass/fail reporting. Use when testing UI changes, verifying PRs before merge, or running regression checks on…
page-serve
Hand a human a rendered HTML page at a stable HTTPS URL. Registers a portless route for a file or directory (https://NAME.localhost/, never a :port), prints the URL, optionally screenshots it, and tears it down on stop. Use when an agent produced a page a human is meant to open: glyph explainers, playgrounds, decision…
recette
Tests d'acceptance automatises avec Claude in Chrome.
check-browser
Use Browser Controller to check what's currently showing in my browser.
run-test
Execute AI agent test script in real browser.