Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/f-amine/vibe-stackWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/f-amine/vibe-stack/performance-bottlenecks)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/f-amine/vibe-stack/performance-bottlenecks"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/f-amine/vibe-stack/performance-bottlenecks/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/f-amine/vibe-stack/performance-bottlenecks"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/f-amine/vibe-stack/performance-bottlenecks.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00310 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00124 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00062 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00031 |
Grade A, and why
performance-bottlenecks scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to performance-bottlenecks — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Performance Bottleneck Analysis
Purpose
Identify and resolve performance bottlenecks in your development workflow.
Automated Analysis
1. Real-time Detection
The post-task hook automatically analyzes:
- Execution time vs. complexity
- Agent utilization rates
- Resource constraints
- Operation patterns
2. Common Bottlenecks
Time Bottlenecks:
- Tasks taking > 5 minutes
- Sequential operations that could parallelize
- Redundant file operations
Coordination Bottlenecks:
- Single agent for complex tasks
- Unbalanced agent workloads
- Poor topology selection
Resource Bottlenecks:
- High operation count (> 100)
- Memory constraints
- I/O limitations
3. Improvement Suggestions
Tool: mcp__claude-flow__task_results
Parameters: {"taskId": "task-123", "format": "detailed"}
Result includes:
{
"bottlenecks": [
{
"type": "coordination",
"severity": "high",
"description": "Single agent used for complex task",
"recommendation": "Spawn specialized agents for parallel work"
}
],
"improvements": [
{
"area": "execution_time",
"suggestion": "Use parallel task execution",
"expectedImprovement": "30-50% time reduction"
}
]
}
Continuous Optimization
The system learns from each task to prevent future bottlenecks!
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 59 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 61e9e3a163b2
performance-bottlenecks is a command published in the GitHub repository f-amine/vibe-stack (21 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 310 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to performance-bottlenecks, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
new
Scaffold a new Better-T-Stack project. Plans a full, validated stack with the Better-T-Stack MCP server, confirms it, then generates the project.
add
Add addons/features (PWA, Tauri, docs, linters, task runners, MCP, …) to an existing Better-T-Stack project via the Better-T-Stack MCP server.
codebase-review
Review an entire codebase for architecture, engineering health, and exploitable risk; generate a prioritized remediation plan, an evidence-anchored system knowledge document, or both.
cyber-triage
Evidence-led blue incident triage with authorization and runtime gates.
fix
When /fix is invoked, immediately execute the following steps.
build
Smart build with validation, error detection, and auto-fix.