Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to FavioVazquez/mollify. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/FavioVazquez/mollify/main/.gemini/commands/mollify/dead-code.tomlgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/FavioVazquez/mollifyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/faviovazquez/mollify/dead-code)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/faviovazquez/mollify/dead-code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/faviovazquez/mollify/dead-code/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/faviovazquez/mollify/dead-code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/faviovazquez/mollify/dead-code.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00347 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00139 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00069 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00035 |
Grade A, and why
dead-code scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
description = "Find dead code (unused files/exports/imports/members/enum members, unreachable code, duplicate re-exports) and summarize prioritized candidates" prompt = """ You are reviewing this repository with Mollify, a deterministic Python code-intelligence engine. Mollify emits evidence, not decisions — every finding has a stable fingerprint, a confidence tier, and a human-readable reason.
Here is the current dead-code output: !{mollify dead-code --format json {{args}}}
Using ONLY this output (do not grep, do not guess, do not invent findings):
- Group findings by
rule(unused-file,unused-export,unused-import,unused-method,unused-attribute,unused-enum-member,unreachable-code,duplicate-export,commented-code) and byconfidence(certain/likely/uncertain), with counts. - List every
confidence: certainfinding withlocation.path:location.line, itsreason, thefingerprint, and whether an action isauto_fixable: true. - Before recommending deletion, verify reachability with
mollify trace <module>ormollify inspect <file>. Reachability is static; dynamic imports (getattr/importlib) downgrade confidence touncertain— review-only. - Propose a fix plan ordered by confidence/severity.
mollify fix --applyauto-removes certain unused symbols and imports; for known-good cases use the finding'ssuppression_commentinstead of deleting. Do NOT modify files without explicit user confirmation. """
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 26 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 1e299df0df7e
dead-code is a command published in the GitHub repository FavioVazquez/mollify (11 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 347 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-22.
Other commands, from other repositories
refactor-clean
Refactor provided code for cleanliness, maintainability, and alignment with SOLID principles and modern best practices — no over-engineering.
deep-audit.skeleton
Description: This section is populated by Bootstrap with manifest data. Required manifest fields: project.description, stack.primary, project.structure, project.subprojects, stack.orm, stack.authmethod Example output.
harness:audit
Cross-dimensional codebase audit orchestrator — classify repo shape, fan out parallel read-only audit agents, dedup and severity-rank findings against existing issues, publish grouped tracking issues.
modify
Command "modify" from MartyBonacci/specswarm, covering user input, flag parsing, parse flags from arguments, mode routing and goal.
prism-graph
Export Prism's graph of this repository and summarise it.
hotfix
Ship a fast branch-based P0 hotfix — diagnose, implement, open a ready-for-review PR, then verify + review after (deferred by design).