A security scanning command for a Python repository that reports possible unsafe patterns, such as dangerous evaluation, exposed secrets, weak cryptography, and risky database or shell use. Its results are candidates, not confirmed vulnerabilities.

Use it to group and inspect security candidates, review their locations and reasons, and plan remediation while verifying each finding in context.

It provides evidence to investigate without treating every match as a proven security problem. This helps focus review on reported locations and confidence levels before making changes.

How FavioVazquez/mollify configures Gemini CLI

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to FavioVazquez/mollify. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file

curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/FavioVazquez/mollify/main/.gemini/commands/mollify/security.toml

Clone the repo

git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/FavioVazquez/mollify

Made for: Gemini CLI.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

README.md

[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/faviovazquez/mollify/security/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/faviovazquez/mollify/security)

Your own site

<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/faviovazquez/mollify/security"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/faviovazquez/mollify/security/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

Your own site · 80×15

<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/faviovazquez/mollify/security"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/faviovazquez/mollify/security.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>

Per session 0 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.

When invoked 258 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.

Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.

Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.

Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

Model	Per session	Once invoked
Fable 5.1	$0.00000	$0.00258
Opus 5.5	$0.00000	$0.00103
Sonnet 5.5	$0.00000	$0.00052
Haiku 4.5	$0.00000	$0.00026

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 54e00b55c540, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

security scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.gemini/commands/mollify/security.toml · 22 lines

What it actually says

description = "Scan for security candidates (eval/exec, shell=True, secrets, weak crypto, ...)" prompt = """ You are reviewing this repository with Mollify, a deterministic Python code-intelligence engine. Mollify emits evidence, not decisions — these are candidates, not confirmed vulnerabilities.

Here is the current security output: !{mollify security --format json {{args}}}

Using ONLY this output (do not grep, do not guess, do not invent findings):

Group findings by rule (dangerous-eval, subprocess-shell-true, sql-injection, unsafe-yaml-load, unsafe-deserialization, tls-verify-disabled, hardcoded-secret, weak-hash, weak-cipher, insecure-random, request-without-timeout, flask-debug-true, jinja2-autoescape-false, try-except-pass) and by confidence, with counts.
List each finding with location.path:location.line, its reason, and the fingerprint.
Propose a remediation plan ordered by severity, verifying each candidate in context. Do NOT modify files without explicit user confirmation. """

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

1mo ago First seen · 22 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 54e00b55c540

Subscribe to this mod's changes

security is a command published in the GitHub repository FavioVazquez/mollify (11 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 258 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-22.

Security

mollify: Command for Gemini CLI

Borrowing it

Wrote this? Show the measurements

What it costs to keep this loaded

Grade A, and why

Nothing flagged

What it actually says

What this file has done since we first saw it

Other commands, from other repositories

checklist

clarify

specify

converge

implement

speckit.bug.fix