Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fengyunzaidushi/claude-code-subagentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/fengyunzaidushi/claude-code-subagents/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/fengyunzaidushi/claude-code-subagents/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/fengyunzaidushi/claude-code-subagents/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/fengyunzaidushi/claude-code-subagents/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/fengyunzaidushi/claude-code-subagents/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00010 | $0.00061 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00030 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00012 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00006 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
使用代码审查代理对最近的更改进行全面的代码审查。重点关注代码质量、安全漏洞和最佳实践。提供按优先级组织的可操作反馈。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 6 lines · 10 tokens per session scan A 0770185953ee
review is a command published in the GitHub repository fengyunzaidushi/claude-code-subagents (11 stars, last pushed 1y ago), licensed MIT. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 61 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
assemble-team
Assemble a pre-built agent team for parallel work - review, feature, debug, cross-platform, full-stack, or research.
review-code
Trigger a comprehensive code review on recent changes or specified files.
review
Review the code changes and provide detailed feedback.
react-patterns
Review React code for performance and composition patterns — 50+ rules ranked by impact.
handoff-verify
A pre-merge review command that sends a code change to several reviewers, then rechecks serious findings. Pre-merge means before the change is added to the main codebase.
review-branch
Review an existing branch holistically before merging — blast radius, conventions, security, and spec compliance.