Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/ferroxlabs/ijfw/ijfw-shipgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/FerroxLabs/ijfwWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/ferroxlabs/ijfw/ijfw-ship)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ferroxlabs/ijfw/ijfw-ship"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ferroxlabs/ijfw/ijfw-ship.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00032 | $0.00581 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00291 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00116 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00058 |
Grade A, and why
ijfw-ship scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Run the Ship phase of the IJFW workflow. This is the final phase -- pre-flight checks, deployment, monitoring, rollback plan, documentation, and memory update.
Ship checklist:
- Changelog updated with what shipped
- Deployment steps verified (or deployment executed if automated)
- Monitoring and alerting confirmed in place
- Rollback plan documented
- User-facing documentation current
- IJFW memory updated with the full project summary
Donahoe principles enforced at ship:
- P15: Updates invisible to users -- no action required from them
- P20: Works on all target platforms
- P21: Pricing respects the user (no surprise costs introduced)
Ledger gate (blocks ship): Before the SHIP GATE runs, read .ijfw/state/execute-issues.json:
read_issues() {
local f=".ijfw/state/execute-issues.json"
[ -f "$f" ] || { printf '{"issues":[]}'; return; }
cat "$f"
}
If any entry has status: unresolved (any kind), ship is refused:
ISSUE: ship-blocked-by-unresolved-issues
count: <N>
ids: [iss_001, iss_002]
action: resolve all issues before shipping
Missing file = zero issues (day-1 fresh-install protection). Resolved and absent entries do not block ship.
Before running, the SHIP GATE re-reads the original brief and confirms what was built matches what was asked. If gaps remain, ship is held until they close.
This command invokes ijfw-workflow at the D6 Ship phase directly.
GATE: The SHIP GATE must pass before deployment proceeds -- original brief re-read, changelog updated, monitoring confirmed, rollback plan documented.
Confidence declaration (required before push/publish): Every ship-readiness
claim is tagged VERIFIED / LIKELY / GUESSING / ISSUE. Ship proceeds only when
every blocking claim is VERIFIED (live-run command with raw output) or LIKELY
with explicit user acknowledgement. GUESSING or ISSUE halts the ship. Publish
operations (git push, git tag v*, npm publish) require the user's
explicit push-word ("push it" / "ship it" / "tag and push") -- no substitute
authorization accepted. See feedback_push_back_on_irreversible.md.
Natural triggers: "ship it", "deploy", "let's ship", "go live", "time to ship", "wrap this up."
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 63 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 69c275b3fcc2
ijfw-ship is a command published in the GitHub repository FerroxLabs/ijfw (210 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 581 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
release
Create a versioned release: update CHANGELOG, bump version, validate, commit, push, and publish a GitHub Release.
reqforge-greenkeeper
Diagnose and fix ReqForge repository release gate failures.
release-builder
Build, audit, and publish project to target channel.
pr-package
Prepare a clean delivery package for GitHub from the real git diff vs an explicit base branch, persisted as PRPACKAGE.md (or PRPACKAGE. .md for multi-repo tasks). Produces branch name, commit messages, fetch, checkout, add, commit, and push commands, PR title and body, and reviewer attention points; never invents work…
sdd-apply
Implement SDD tasks — writes code following specs and design.
gentle-sdd-ff
Fast-forward all SDD planning phases — proposal through tasks.