Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/flasherses/claude-code-dotfiles/reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/flasherses/claude-code-dotfilesWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00319 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00160 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00064 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00032 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/review — 代码审查
对指定文件或最近变更执行全流程代码审查。
用法
/review [文件或目录路径]
不指定路径时，审查 git diff 中所有变更文件。
执行流程
-
确定审查范围
- 如果提供了
$ARGUMENTS，审查指定文件 - 如果未提供参数，运行
git diff --name-only获取变更文件列表 - 如果不在 git 仓库中，提示用户指定文件
- 如果提供了
-
代码审查 — 调起
code-reviewer子代理逐文件审查- 关注：安全漏洞、逻辑错误、代码质量、性能问题
-
安全审计（如涉及以下文件类型自动触发）
- 配置文件（
.json,.yaml,.env,.toml） - 认证相关代码（
auth,login,session,token） - 数据库操作代码（
sql,query,migrate） - 调起
security-auditor子代理
- 配置文件（
-
汇总报告 — 合并 reviewer 和 auditor 的输出，给出总体评估
输出
- 审查文件数
- 问题汇总：Critical / Warning / Suggestion 各多少
- 整体评估：PASS / NEEDS FIXES / DO NOT MERGE
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 36 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 33d566df9ef9
review is a command published in the GitHub repository flasherses/claude-code-dotfiles (5 stars, last pushed 22d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 319 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
git
Git operations with intelligent commit messages and workflow optimization.
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.
constitution
Create or update the project constitution from interactive or provided principle inputs.