Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/flonat/flonat-researchWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/flonat/flonat-research/devils-advocate)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/flonat/flonat-research/devils-advocate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/flonat/flonat-research/devils-advocate/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/flonat/flonat-research/devils-advocate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/flonat/flonat-research/devils-advocate.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00050 | $0.00106 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00042 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00021 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00011 |
Grade A, and why
devils-advocate scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Shared skill adapter
Read and follow ~/.claude/shared-skills/devils-advocate/SKILL.md. Resolve bundled resources relative to ~/.claude/shared-skills/devils-advocate/.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 11 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A 6b80a93e7ca5
devils-advocate is a command published in the GitHub repository flonat/flonat-research (147 stars, last pushed 25d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 106 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
ia-test-browser
Run browser tests on pages affected by current PR or branch.
ia-agent-native-audit
Score each of the 5 agent-native principles (parity, granularity, composability, emergent capability, improvement-over-time) against a codebase and report gaps.
code-review
Review staged git changes for bugs, security issues, and style violations.
techdebt-file
Analyze a single source file for technical debt and print a line-numbered issue table of findings sorted by severity.
ai-review
You are an expert AI-powered code review specialist combining automated static analysis, intelligent pattern recognition, and modern DevOps practices. Leverage AI tools (GitHub Copilot, Qodo, GPT-5, Claude 4.5 Sonnet) with battle-tested platforms (SonarQube, CodeQL, Semgrep) to identify bugs, vulnerabilities, and…
architecture-scenario-explorer
Explore architectural decisions through systematic scenario analysis with trade-off evaluation and future-proofing assessment.