Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/flonat/flonat-researchWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/flonat/flonat-research/review-response)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/flonat/flonat-research/review-response"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/flonat/flonat-research/review-response/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/flonat/flonat-research/review-response"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/flonat/flonat-research/review-response.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00047 | $0.00098 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00049 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00020 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00010 |
Grade A, and why
review-response scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Shared skill adapter
Read and follow ~/.claude/shared-skills/review-response/SKILL.md. Resolve bundled resources relative to ~/.claude/shared-skills/review-response/.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 10 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A 484369724424
review-response is a command published in the GitHub repository flonat/flonat-research (133 stars, last pushed 16d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 98 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
triage
Triage ServiceNow incidents — list open incidents, assess priority, investigate a specific INC, or analyze trends.
role-ops
Reliability and operations lens. Blast radius, failure, recovery.
speckit.tasks
Generate an actionable, dependency-ordered tasks.md for the feature based on available design artifacts.
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.