Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Fmarzochi/EGCWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/fmarzochi/egc/e2e)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/fmarzochi/egc/e2e"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/fmarzochi/egc/e2e/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/fmarzochi/egc/e2e"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/fmarzochi/egc/e2e.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00010 | $0.00578 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00231 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00116 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00058 |
Grade A, and why
e2e scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
94% identical to e2e — 2 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 106 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
E2E Command
Generate and run end-to-end tests using Playwright: $ARGUMENTS
Your Task
- Analyze user flow to test
- Create test journey with Playwright
- Run tests and capture artifacts
- Report results with screenshots/videos
Test Structure
import { test, expect } from '@playwright/test'
test.describe('Feature: [Name]', () => {
test.beforeEach(async ({ page }) => {
// Setup: Navigate, authenticate, prepare state
})
test('should [expected behavior]', async ({ page }) => {
// Arrange: Set up test data
// Act: Perform user actions
await page.click('[data-testid="button"]')
await page.fill('[data-testid="input"]', 'value')
// Assert: Verify results
await expect(page.locator('[data-testid="result"]')).toBeVisible()
})
test.afterEach(async ({ page }, testInfo) => {
// Capture screenshot on failure
if (testInfo.status !== 'passed') {
await page.screenshot({ path: `test-results/${testInfo.title}.png` })
}
})
})
Best Practices
Selectors
- Prefer
data-testidattributes - Avoid CSS classes (they change)
- Use semantic selectors (roles, labels)
Waits
- Use Playwright's auto-waiting
- Avoid
page.waitForTimeout() - Use
expect().toBeVisible()for assertions
Test Isolation
- Each test should be independent
- Clean up test data after
- Don't rely on test order
Artifacts to Capture
- Screenshots on failure
- Videos for debugging
- Trace files for detailed analysis
- Network logs if relevant
Test Categories
-
Critical User Flows
- Authentication (login, logout, signup)
- Core feature happy paths
- Payment/checkout flows
-
Edge Cases
- Network failures
- Invalid inputs
- Session expiry
-
Cross-Browser
- Chrome, Firefox, Safari
- Mobile viewports
Report Format
E2E Test Results
================
PASS: Passed: X
FAIL: Failed: Y
SKIPPED: Skipped: Z
Failed Tests:
- test-name: Error message
Screenshot: path/to/screenshot.png
Video: path/to/video.webm
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 106 lines · 10 tokens per session scan A 97ad4443a3ac
e2e is a command published in the GitHub repository Fmarzochi/EGC (67 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 578 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 94% identical to e2e, differing in 2 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
ui-aqa-flow-selector-identification
Phase 4 Selector Identification of ui-aqa-flow.
ui-aqa-flow-selector-implementation
Phase 5 Selector Implementation of ui-aqa-flow.
web-runtime-verify
Verify a built web frontend at runtime: serve the build, assert page identity, run the web battery (overflow 320 to 2560, keyboard, console, Lighthouse, axe), and decide a PASS/FAIL/BLOCKED gate. Fixes are routed, not applied. Do not use to plan (implementation-plan), write code (implement-approved-slice), for perf…
expect
Diff-aware AI browser testing — reads the git diff, maps changes to affected pages via the route map, generates a targeted test plan, and executes it via agent-browser (Rust daemon + CDP, ARIA-tree-first) with pass/fail reporting. Use when testing UI changes, verifying PRs before merge, or running regression checks on…
webapp-testing
Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.
amazing-e2e-check
Run explicitly requested E2E, browser, device, or installed-deployment scenarios in an independent verification workflow.