Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/fmarzochi/egc/multi-workflowgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Fmarzochi/EGCWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/fmarzochi/egc/multi-workflow)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/fmarzochi/egc/multi-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/fmarzochi/egc/multi-workflow.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00019 | $0.01843 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00922 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00369 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00184 |
Grade A, and why
multi-workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
81% identical to multi-workflow — 29 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 196 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Workflow - Multi-Model Collaborative Development
Multi-model collaborative development workflow (Research → Ideation → Plan → Execute → Optimize → Review), with intelligent routing: Frontend → Gemini, Backend → Codex.
Structured development workflow with quality gates, MCP services, and multi-model collaboration.
Usage
/workflow <task description>
Context
- Task to develop: $ARGUMENTS
- Structured 6-phase workflow with quality gates
- Multi-model collaboration: Codex (backend) + Gemini (frontend) + Gemini (orchestration)
- MCP service integration (ace-tool, optional) for enhanced capabilities
Your Role
You are the Orchestrator, coordinating a multi-model collaborative system (Research → Ideation → Plan → Execute → Optimize → Review). Communicate concisely and professionally for experienced developers.
Collaborative Models:
- ace-tool MCP (optional) – Code retrieval + Prompt enhancement
- Codex – Backend logic, algorithms, debugging (Backend authority, trustworthy)
- Gemini – Frontend UI/UX, visual design (Frontend expert, backend opinions for reference only)
- Gemini (self) – Orchestration, planning, execution, delivery
Multi-Model Call Specification
Call syntax (parallel: run_in_background: true, sequential: false):
# New session call
Bash({
command: "~/.gemini/bin/codeagent-wrapper {{LITE_MODE_FLAG}}--backend <codex|gemini> {{GEMINI_MODEL_FLAG}}- \"$PWD\" <<'EOF'
ROLE_FILE: <role prompt path>
<TASK>
Requirement: <enhanced requirement (or $ARGUMENTS if not enhanced)>
Context: <project context and analysis from previous phases>
</TASK>
OUTPUT: Expected output format
EOF",
run_in_background: true,
timeout: 3600000,
description: "Brief description"
})
# Resume session call
Bash({
command: "~/.gemini/bin/codeagent-wrapper {{LITE_MODE_FLAG}}--backend <codex|gemini> {{GEMINI_MODEL_FLAG}}resume <SESSION_ID> - \"$PWD\" <<'EOF'
ROLE_FILE: <role prompt path>
<TASK>
Requirement: <enhanced requirement (or $ARGUMENTS if not enhanced)>
Context: <project context and analysis from previous phases>
</TASK>
OUTPUT: Expected output format
EOF",
run_in_background: true,
timeout: 3600000,
description: "Brief description"
})
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 196 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A 1466c6295dc3
multi-workflow is a command published in the GitHub repository Fmarzochi/EGC (48 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 1,843 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 81% identical to multi-workflow, differing in 29 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
demand-discovery
Run automated niche demand discovery research across 7 data sources and 26 categories.
tdd-workflow
Implement the behavior described in $ARGUMENTS using strict TDD. Follow this exact sequence. Do not collapse phases. Each gate requires actual test runner output.
code-review
Review the code changes in this project. For each file changed.
refactor-file
Refactor the file specified in $ARGUMENTS following project conventions.
api-add-endpoint
Create a new API endpoint. $ARGUMENTS should describe the endpoint (e.g., "POST /api/users - create a user").
api-test-endpoint
Test the API endpoint specified in $ARGUMENTS.