Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/fmarzochi/egc/prgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Fmarzochi/EGCWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/fmarzochi/egc/pr)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/fmarzochi/egc/pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/fmarzochi/egc/pr.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00021 | $0.01275 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00638 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00255 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00128 |
Grade A, and why
pr scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
94% identical to pr — 32 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 185 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Create Pull Request
Input: $ARGUMENTS: optional, may contain a base branch name and/or flags (e.g., --draft).
Parse $ARGUMENTS:
- Extract any recognized flags (
--draft) - Treat remaining non-flag text as the base branch name
- Default base branch to
mainif none specified
Phase 1: VALIDATE
Check preconditions:
git branch --show-current
git status --short
git log origin/<base>..HEAD --oneline
| Check | Condition | Action if Failed |
|---|---|---|
| Not on base branch | Current branch ≠ base | Stop: "Switch to a feature branch first." |
| Clean working directory | No uncommitted changes | Warn: "You have uncommitted changes. Commit or stash first." |
| Has commits ahead | git log origin/<base>..HEAD not empty |
Stop: "No commits ahead of <base>. Nothing to PR." |
| No existing PR | gh pr list --head <branch> --json number is empty |
Stop: "PR already exists: #. Use gh pr view <number> --web to open it." |
If all checks pass, proceed.
Phase 2: DISCOVER
PR Template
Search for PR template in order:
.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/directory: if exists, list files and let user choose (or usedefault.md).github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md.github/pull_request_template.mddocs/pull_request_template.md
If found, read it and use its structure for the PR body.
Commit Analysis
git log origin/<base>..HEAD --format="%h %s" --reverse
Analyze commits to determine:
- PR title: Use conventional commit format with type prefix:
feat: ...,fix: ..., etc.- If multiple types, use the dominant one
- If single commit, use its message as-is
- Change summary: Group commits by type/area
File Analysis
git diff origin/<base>..HEAD --stat
git diff origin/<base>..HEAD --name-only
Categorize changed files: source, tests, docs, config, migrations.
Planning Artifacts
Check for related artifacts produced by /plan-prd, /plan, or the legacy PRP workflow:
.Gemini/prds/: PRDs this PR implements a milestone of.Gemini/plans/: Plans executed by this PR.Gemini/PRPs/prds/: legacy PRP PRDs.Gemini/PRPs/plans/: legacy PRP implementation plans.Gemini/PRPs/reports/: legacy PRP implementation reports
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 185 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A f72779d103d0
pr is a command published in the GitHub repository Fmarzochi/EGC (48 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 1,275 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 94% identical to pr, differing in 32 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
ship
Run the pre-launch checklist via parallel fan-out to specialist personas, then synthesize a go/no-go decision.
release
Walk the llmwiki release process step by step.
queue
"What's coming up — plan steps, releases, backlog, and overdue decisions?".
changelog
Create engaging changelogs for recent merges to main branch.
reqforge-greenkeeper
Diagnose and fix ReqForge repository release gate failures.
pr-package
Prepare a clean delivery package for GitHub from the real git diff vs an explicit base branch, persisted as PRPACKAGE.md (or PRPACKAGE. .md for multi-repo tasks). Produces branch name, commit messages, fetch, checkout, add, commit, and push commands, PR title and body, and reviewer attention points; never invents work…