Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to Fmarzochi/EGC. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Fmarzochi/EGC/main/.opencode/commands/promote.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Fmarzochi/EGCWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/fmarzochi/egc/promote)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/fmarzochi/egc/promote"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/fmarzochi/egc/promote/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/fmarzochi/egc/promote"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/fmarzochi/egc/promote.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00007 | $0.00117 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00047 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00023 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00012 |
Grade A, and why
promote scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Promote Command
Promote instincts in continuous-learning-v2: $ARGUMENTS
Your Task
Run:
python3 "${GEMINI_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/continuous-learning-v2/scripts/instinct-cli.py" promote $ARGUMENTS
If GEMINI_PLUGIN_ROOT is unavailable, use:
python3 ~/.gemini/skills/continuous-learning-v2/scripts/instinct-cli.py promote $ARGUMENTS
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 24 lines · 7 tokens per session scan A 41594ed10a45
promote is a command published in the GitHub repository Fmarzochi/EGC (67 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 7 tokens to every session and 117 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
demand-discovery
Run automated niche demand discovery research across 7 data sources and 26 categories.
lians-recall
Recall current (non-stale) facts from Lians memory, optionally as-of a past date.
handoff
Export a Waybill Bundle by default, or import one when requested.
start-10-1
A guided lesson on setting up clasp, a command-line tool for managing Google Apps Script projects, and connecting it to Google’s Apps Script API.
t800-onboard
A command for newcomers that explains what is installed in Cursor globally and in the current project, plus what the T-800 team can do.
self-review
Review only changed files in this branch Your primary goal is to provide valuable, trustworthy feedback while avoiding false positives and low-impact commentary.