Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/fomo-driven-development/strategic-claude-base/update_summarygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Fomo-Driven-Development/strategic-claude-baseWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/fomo-driven-development/strategic-claude-base/update_summary)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/fomo-driven-development/strategic-claude-base/update_summary"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/fomo-driven-development/strategic-claude-base/update_summary.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00009 | $0.03965 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.01982 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00793 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00396 |
Grade A, and why
update_summary scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 512 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are tasked with updating existing implementation summaries by analyzing the current work session and intelligently merging new findings with existing problems and incomplete work. You should be smart enough to detect if the wrong summary document was provided and only update summaries that are specific to the current work.
Summary file to update: $1
Initial Response
When this command is invoked:
-
Check if summary file path was provided:
- If summary file path was provided, proceed with validation
- If no summary file provided, respond with:
I'll update an existing summary document with your latest implementation progress. Please provide the summary file path to update: Example: `/update_summary @.strategic-claude-basic/summary/SUMMARY_PLAN_0001_07-09-2025_sat_user-auth.md` I'll validate that the summary matches your current work and intelligently merge new progress.Then wait for the user's input.
Process Steps
Step 1: Summary Document Validation
-
Verify summary document exists and is valid:
# Check if file exists test -f "$1" && echo "File exists" || echo "File not found" # Check if it's in the correct directory echo "$1" | grep -q "\.strategic-claude-basic/summary/" && echo "Correct directory" || echo "Wrong directory" -
Parse existing summary document:
- Read the complete summary document
- Extract frontmatter metadata (plan_reference, phase, status, completion_rate, etc.)
- Identify all existing issues (Critical, Incomplete, TODOs, Discovered)
- Note files mentioned in the "Files Modified/Created" section
- Extract the original creation date and last_updated
-
Validate summary document format:
- Verify it follows the standard summary template structure
- Check that it has proper frontmatter with required fields
- Confirm it's actually a summary document (not a plan or research doc)
- If invalid format, respond with error and guidance
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 512 lines · 9 tokens per session scan A 7c6e75861617
update_summary is a command published in the GitHub repository Fomo-Driven-Development/strategic-claude-base (2 stars, last pushed 9mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 9 tokens to every session and 3,965 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.
implement
Execute the implementation plan by processing and executing all tasks defined in tasks.md.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.