Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ForgeyClap/claude-forgeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/forgeyclap/claude-forge/revise-claude-md)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/forgeyclap/claude-forge/revise-claude-md"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/forgeyclap/claude-forge/revise-claude-md/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/forgeyclap/claude-forge/revise-claude-md"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/forgeyclap/claude-forge/revise-claude-md.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00011 | $0.00582 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00233 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00116 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00058 |
Grade A, and why
revise-claude-md scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 20d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 64 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Review this session for learnings about working with Claude Code in this codebase. Update CLAUDE.md with context that would help future Claude sessions be more effective.
Step 1: Reflect
What context was missing that would have helped Claude work more effectively?
- Bash commands that were used or discovered
- Code style patterns followed
- Testing approaches that worked
- Environment/configuration quirks
- Warnings or gotchas encountered
Step 2: Find CLAUDE.md Files
find . -name "CLAUDE.md" -o -name ".claude.local.md" 2>/dev/null | head -20
Decide where each addition belongs:
CLAUDE.md- Team-shared (checked into git).claude.local.md- Personal/local only (gitignored)
Step 3: Draft Additions
Keep it concise - one line per concept. CLAUDE.md is part of the prompt, so brevity matters.
Format: <command or pattern> - <brief description>
Avoid:
- Verbose explanations
- Obvious information
- One-off fixes unlikely to recur
Step 4: Show Proposed Changes
For each addition:
### Update: ./CLAUDE.md
**Why:** [one-line reason]
\`\`\`diff
+ [the addition - keep it brief]
\`\`\`
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 20d ago First seen · 64 lines · 11 tokens per session scan A afc263266df7
revise-claude-md is a command published in the GitHub repository ForgeyClap/claude-forge (2 stars, last pushed 15d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 11 tokens to every session and 582 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-25.
Other commands, from other repositories
scout-meta-review
Run an interactive Scout meta-review — a system-level audit that sits above the individual session types. Checks whether sessions are running, mistake audit is trending well, proposals are flowing, KB files are healthy, and data-source coverage is consistent across session types. Runs in the current conversation.
scout-work
Interactive work session — walks through today's actionable items one at a time, presents a recommended action with draft content, and executes each one only with explicit approval. Runs in the current conversation (not as a background session).
pause
Checkpoint the ticket in play so it can be resumed later.
audit
Audit closed tickets for regressions against today's code (unchanged, evolved, implemented wrong, not implemented), plus duplicate and groupable open ones.
dashboard
Show the repo dashboard: the pinned index of every open map, the whiteboard, and live counts.
split
Split an oversized ticket into children and supersede it.