Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/franciszhangkk/claude-obsidian-multi-repo-trackerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/franciszhangkk/claude-obsidian-multi-repo-tracker/update-memory)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/franciszhangkk/claude-obsidian-multi-repo-tracker/update-memory"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/franciszhangkk/claude-obsidian-multi-repo-tracker/update-memory/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/franciszhangkk/claude-obsidian-multi-repo-tracker/update-memory"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/franciszhangkk/claude-obsidian-multi-repo-tracker/update-memory.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.02348 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.01174 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00470 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00235 |
Grade A, and why
update-memory scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 200 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/update-memory — 漂移对账 + 文档地图刷新
/sync-docs 是流水账（只看最新 commit，无判断），/update-memory 是年度审计（全量扫描，找漂移）。
何时用：每周一次 / 大功能完成后 / 接手老项目第一天 / 发现 Claude 行为奇怪时。
不要用 / 不能替代的：日常 commit 后的同步（用 /commit 即可）。
执行流程
1. 解析参数和定位项目
# 当前 git 仓库根
CODE_ROOT=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)
# 从 vault CLAUDE.md 找映射
VAULT_PATH="${OBSIDIAN_VAULT_PATH:-}"
[ -z "$VAULT_PATH" ] && echo "未配置 OBSIDIAN_VAULT_PATH，退出" && exit 1
支持参数：
/update-memory→ 当前仓库/update-memory <项目名>→ 指定项目/update-memory --all→ 扫所有项目（耗时较长，会提示）
2. 收集对账输入
并发读取：
- Obsidian 项目目录所有 .md：
find $VAULT_PATH/项目/<name>/ -name "*.md" -type f - 概览.md frontmatter：解析
docs:字段（人工维护的真相源）和"关键模块"段 - 最近 30 天 git log：
git log --since="30 days ago" --name-only --pretty=format:"%h|%ai|%s" - auto-memory 对应文件：
~/.claude/projects/<encoded-cwd>/memory/project_*.md（如有） - 代码仓库 CLAUDE.md 的"Obsidian 文档地图"段
3. 执行 4 类对账检查
检查 A：Obsidian 引用的代码文件是否存在
扫所有 Obsidian .md 中的代码路径引用（形如 `biz/agent/...`、pkg/llm/...、行内 code 含 / 和 .go/.py/.proto）：
grep -rEho '`[a-zA-Z_/][a-zA-Z0-9_/.-]+\.(go|py|proto|ts|tsx|java)`' "$VAULT_PATH/项目/<name>/"
对每个引用：检查 $CODE_ROOT/<path> 是否存在。
不存在 → 标记 "幽灵引用"（Obsidian 提到的代码已删/重命名）。
检查 B：概览.md 的"关键模块"是否还在
读概览.md 的"关键模块"或"主要模块"表格，对每个模块路径检查 $CODE_ROOT/<path> 是否存在。
不存在 → 标记 "模块漂移"。
检查 C：30 天内代码改了但 Obsidian 没改
对每个 02-功能/ 子文档：
- 找文档中提到的代码路径（同检查 A）
- 看这些代码文件 30 天内是否有修改（
git log --since=30d -- <path>） - 看对应 02-功能/.md 的修改时间（文件 mtime 或 git log）
- 代码改了 + 文档至少 7 天没动 → 标记 "可能漂移"
检查 D：auto-memory 与 Obsidian 概览不一致
对照 ~/.claude/projects/<encoded-cwd>/memory/project_*.md 内容 vs Obsidian 概览.md 的关键事实（技术栈、Agent 列表、关键模块）：
- 字段值不同 → 标记 "memory 漂移"
4. 生成对账报告
按严重度排序输出：
📊 漂移对账报告 — <项目名>
扫描时间：<YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM>
覆盖：Obsidian 24 文档 / 代码 30 天 47 提交 / auto-memory 2 文件
🔴 幽灵引用（3 处）
1. 项目/<name>/02-功能/Skill架构/query-ad-data-skill迁移设计.md:42
引用 `biz/agent/ad/skills/query-ad-data-xd/` — 代码已不存在
[a] 改 Obsidian 删除/更新引用
[b] 跳过（这是历史记录）
🟡 模块漂移（1 处）
2. 概览.md "关键模块" 表格列出 `pkg/embedding/` — 代码里没有
[a] 改 Obsidian 概览
[b] 跳过
🟡 可能漂移（2 处）
3. biz/agent/ad/skills/query-ad-data/ 30 天内 5 commits（最新 2026-04-21）
但 02-功能/Skill架构/query-ad-data-skill迁移设计.md 上次修改 2026-03-15
[a] 标 TODO 让用户人工确认
[b] 自动总结代码变更追加到文档"近期更新"段
[c] 跳过
🟢 memory 漂移（0 处）
✨ 文档地图刷新（5 处变化）
- 新增：02-功能/<新加的文件>.md（追加到地图，desc 留 TODO）
- 删除：05-测试与调试/<已删除的文件>.md（从地图移除）
- 更新 desc：3 处（按 概览.md 的 docs: frontmatter）
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 200 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A 1472ec29539e
update-memory is a command published in the GitHub repository franciszhangkk/claude-obsidian-multi-repo-tracker (2 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 2,348 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
unforgit
Show Unforgit repository-memory status and suggest the next useful action.
unforgit-curate
Review and improve Unforgit memory quality.
unforgit-health
Inspect Unforgit memory health.
unforgit-recall
Search Unforgit memory for context relevant to the user's current request.
flow-import
Cold-start import — extract baseline knowledge from an existing project (resumable).
knowledge
Knowledge base utilities — sync (pull/push), lint, stats, decay.