Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/frankxai/agentic-creator-osWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/frankxai/agentic-creator-os/discuss-phase)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/frankxai/agentic-creator-os/discuss-phase"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/frankxai/agentic-creator-os/discuss-phase/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/frankxai/agentic-creator-os/discuss-phase"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/frankxai/agentic-creator-os/discuss-phase.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00029 | $0.00638 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00319 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00128 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00064 |
Grade A, and why
gsd:discuss-phase scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
2 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- gsd:discuss-phase — 88% identical, 32 lines differ
- gsd:discuss-phase — 88% identical, 46 lines differ
What it actually says
How it works:
- Load prior context (PROJECT.md, REQUIREMENTS.md, STATE.md, prior CONTEXT.md files)
- Scout codebase for reusable assets and patterns
- Analyze phase — skip gray areas already decided in prior phases
- Present remaining gray areas — user selects which to discuss
- Deep-dive each selected area until satisfied
- Create CONTEXT.md with decisions that guide research and planning
Output: {phase_num}-CONTEXT.md — decisions clear enough that downstream agents can act without asking the user again
<execution_context>
@/.claude/get-shit-done/workflows/discuss-phase.md
@/.claude/get-shit-done/workflows/discuss-phase-assumptions.md
@~/.claude/get-shit-done/templates/context.md
</execution_context>
Context files are resolved in-workflow using init phase-op and roadmap/state tool calls.
If DISCUSS_MODE is "assumptions": Read and execute @~/.claude/get-shit-done/workflows/discuss-phase-assumptions.md end-to-end.
If DISCUSS_MODE is "discuss" (or unset, or any other value): Read and execute @~/.claude/get-shit-done/workflows/discuss-phase.md end-to-end.
MANDATORY: The execution_context files listed above ARE the instructions. Read the workflow file BEFORE taking any action. The objective and success_criteria sections in this command file are summaries — the workflow file contains the complete step-by-step process with all required behaviors, config checks, and interaction patterns. Do not improvise from the summary.
<success_criteria>
- Prior context loaded and applied (no re-asking decided questions)
- Gray areas identified through intelligent analysis
- User chose which areas to discuss
- Each selected area explored until satisfied
- Scope creep redirected to deferred ideas
- CONTEXT.md captures decisions, not vague vision
- User knows next steps </success_criteria>
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 65 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A 0ec81f62def9
gsd:discuss-phase is a command published in the GitHub repository frankxai/agentic-creator-os (10 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 638 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
security-audit-static
Static security audit of AI-built code — map trust boundaries, cross-reference documented intent, self-refute every finding, and report only evidence-backed risks.
performance-audit-static
Static performance audit of AI-built code — find N+1 queries and request waterfalls, over-fetching, missing indexes, and caching opportunities, ranked by effort and impact.
sprint
Sprint lifecycle — plan a sprint, run a retrospective, or generate release notes.
document-app
Reverse-engineer an AI-built codebase into the system documents reviewers and auditors need — a core set (architecture, flows, permissions, variables) plus conditional docs (emails, cron, SEO, automation) when they apply.
analyze-test
Analyze A/B test results — statistical significance, sample size validation, and ship/extend/stop recommendations.
meeting-notes
Summarize a meeting transcript into structured notes with decisions, action items, and follow-ups.