Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/frankxai/agentic-creator-osWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/frankxai/agentic-creator-os/workflow-select)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/frankxai/agentic-creator-os/workflow-select"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/frankxai/agentic-creator-os/workflow-select/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/frankxai/agentic-creator-os/workflow-select"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/frankxai/agentic-creator-os/workflow-select.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00139 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00056 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00028 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00014 |
Grade A, and why
workflow-select scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to workflow-select — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
workflow-select
Automatically select optimal workflow based on task type.
Usage
npx claude-flow automation workflow-select [options]
Options
--task <description>- Task description--constraints <list>- Workflow constraints--preview- Preview without executing
Examples
# Select workflow for task
npx claude-flow automation workflow-select --task "Deploy to production"
# With constraints
npx claude-flow automation workflow-select --constraints "no-downtime,rollback"
# Preview mode
npx claude-flow automation workflow-select --task "Database migration" --preview
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 26 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 296b3c5dc631
workflow-select is a command published in the GitHub repository frankxai/agentic-creator-os (12 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 139 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to workflow-select, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
security-audit-static
Static security audit of AI-built code — map trust boundaries, cross-reference documented intent, self-refute every finding, and report only evidence-backed risks. Scope it to a release's changes with a git range ( .. ) or changes for the uncommitted working tree; audit the whole repository for the first release or…
document-app
Reverse-engineer an AI-built codebase into the system documents reviewers and auditors need — a core set (architecture, flows, permissions, variables) plus conditional docs (emails, cron, SEO, automation) when they apply. check mode writes nothing and reports where the existing docs and the code disagree.
performance-audit-static
Static performance audit of AI-built code — find N+1 queries and request waterfalls, over-fetching, missing indexes, and caching opportunities, ranked by effort and impact. Scope it to a release's changes with a git range ( .. ) or changes for the uncommitted working tree; audit the whole repository for the first…
proof-points
Pull proof points from decks/battlecards, register, verify, or audit the claims your messaging relies on — then deepen brain Section 6 argument-hint: ".
experiment
Build, audit, or score a growth experiment document.
interview-summary
Summarize a customer interview transcript using JTBD analysis.