culture-rituals

culture-rituals is a command for Claude Code from frankxai/Starlight-Intelligence-System. It costs 83 tokens per session (3,092 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A plan for recurring workplace rituals across daily, weekly, monthly, and quarterly schedules, plus yearly milestones. It also checks whether existing habits build belonging or wear it down.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to design or review rituals for onsite, hybrid, or remote teams, based on company size and declared values. It covers recurring practices that support connection and belonging.
Why use it?
It helps organizations move beyond one-off events and turn their values into repeated ways of working. It can reveal habits such as constant meetings or visibility-based recognition that harm team culture.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter.

Part of the starlight-intelligence-system plugin — 6 skills, 121 commands, 7 agents shipped together

Good fit Use it to design or review rituals for onsite, hybrid, or remote teams, based on company size and declared values. It covers recurring practices that support connection and belonging.

Compare 6 commands from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/frankxai/starlight-intelligence-system/culture-rituals
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/frankxai/Starlight-Intelligence-System

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install starlight-intelligence-system, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 6 skills, 121 commands, 7 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for culture-rituals

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/frankxai/starlight-intelligence-system/culture-rituals/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/frankxai/starlight-intelligence-system/culture-rituals)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/frankxai/starlight-intelligence-system/culture-rituals"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/frankxai/starlight-intelligence-system/culture-rituals/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for culture-rituals

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/frankxai/starlight-intelligence-system/culture-rituals"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/frankxai/starlight-intelligence-system/culture-rituals.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 83 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 3,092 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00083 $0.03092
Opus 5 $0.00042 $0.01546
Sonnet 5 $0.00017 $0.00618
Haiku 4.5 $0.00008 $0.00309

Measured 12d ago against content hash a66bddec62c9, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

culture-rituals scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/commands/culture-rituals.md · 226 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 226 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

/culture-rituals

Load SIP.md, VOICES.md, agents/starlight-culture.md, skills/people-intelligence/culture-design.md. Produce a Ritual Architecture.

Refusal frame

This command does not produce off-site agendas, awards-ceremony plans, or single-event culture initiatives. Rituals are weekly/monthly/quarterly recurrences that compound. Annual events are spikes, not architecture. If the request is "design our annual all-hands theme," route out.

Input

$ARGUMENTS

Flags

  • --size <S|M|L> — S = under 50, M = 50-250, L = 250+. Ritual cadence and facilitation pattern shifts by size.
  • --pattern <onsite|hybrid|remote> — physical pattern affects which rituals work and which collapse. Required.
  • --values "v1,v2,v3" — the operationalized values that rituals must reinforce. Required.
  • Optional context paragraph — current rituals (if any), current pain points, recent restructure.

Process

  1. Audit current rituals + anti-rituals — what does the org already do across the four cadences? Which create belonging, which erode it?
  2. Design rituals across four cadences + annual milestones — each ritual SCARF-grounded, belonging mechanism named, success indicator specified.
  3. Anti-ritual removal recommendations — surface current anti-rituals (back-to-back meetings, recognition-by-visibility, "open door" theater, all-hands as broadcast) and recommend their removal before adding new rituals.
  4. Facilitation protocol per ritual — who runs it, in what format, with what time-box, with what artifact.
  5. Save — write to people-intelligence/culture/rituals-<org>-<date>.md.
  6. Hand off — exactly one named next move.

Output format

# Ritual Architecture — <Org Name> — <YYYY-MM-DD>

> *"Rituals create belonging through shared, repeated experience (Turner, Bell). Most companies have weak rituals (annual all-hands, awards) and strong anti-rituals (back-to-back meetings, async-everything that erodes weak ties). The architecture is what's missing."*

## Context

- **Org:** <name>, <size>, <pattern>
- **Operationalized values to reinforce:** <list>
- **Current rituals (audited):** <list>
- **Current anti-rituals (audited):** <list>

---

## Section 1 — Anti-ritual audit (remove before adding)

The most overlooked move. Surface current anti-rituals and recommend removal **before** layering new rituals on top.

| Anti-ritual | Mechanism of harm | SCARF threat activated | Belonging impact | Remediation |
|-------------|-------------------|------------------------|------------------|-------------|
| Back-to-back meeting culture | No recovery → cortisol-driven decisions, no deep work | Autonomy, Certainty | Erodes individual capacity → weakens collective output | 25/50-minute defaults; meeting-free days; explicit no-meeting-after-hours; calendar audit at manager level |
| Recognition-by-visibility | Rewards extroverts and self-promoters; punishes deep workers | Status, Fairness | Builds resentment; signals that "being seen" matters more than contribution | Replace with peer-nomination + manager-review hybrid; surface non-visible contributions explicitly |
| All-hands as broadcast | One-way info dump; zero genuine Q&A → activates Status threat | Status, Autonomy | Reinforces passive culture | Replace 30 min broadcast with 10 min broadcast + 20 min real Q&A or breakout dialogue |
| "Open door" policy theater | Punishes those who use it (perceived as not autonomous) | Autonomy, Status | Silent disagreement | Replace with structured 1:1 cadence + explicit "bad news welcome" framing in 1:1 charters |
| Async-everything for distributed teams | Erodes weak-tie relationships → social distance activates exclusion circuits (Eisenberger) | Relatedness | Belonging collapses; engagement drops | Add scheduled real-time rituals (weekly team rhythm, monthly virtual coffee) — async + sync hybrid |
| <other anti-ritual> | <mechanism> | <SCARF> | <belonging> | <remediation> |

---

## Section 2 — Daily rituals

Short, low-cost, high-frequency. Build the substrate.

### Daily Ritual A: <name — e.g., "Async standup post">
- **Purpose:** team coordination + lightweight visibility
- **SCARF activation:** Certainty (clarity on what's happening), Relatedness (lightweight presence)
- **Belonging mechanism:** small, repeated co-presence
- **Format:** 3-line post (yesterday / today / blockers) in shared channel by <time>
- **Time-box:** ≤ 5 minutes per person
- **Facilitator:** rotating team-member; no manager-led
- **Success indicator:** ≥ 80% participation rate; signal-to-noise stays high; blockers actually surface
- **Avoid:** turning it into status-reporting theater; manager-led format (kills the belonging mechanism)

### Daily Ritual B: <if applicable for the size/pattern>
<same structure>

---

## Section 3 — Weekly rituals (the substrate of belonging)

Most-load-bearing cadence. The weekly rhythm is where the lived culture is actually expressed.

### Weekly Ritual A: <name — e.g., "Friday wins + lessons">
- **Purpose:** belonging through shared celebration + psychological safety through normalized lesson-sharing
- **SCARF activation:** Status (recognition), Relatedness (shared experience), Fairness (everyone gets a turn)
- **Belonging mechanism:** Turner-style ritual through repeated shared experience
- **Reinforces value:** <which operationalized value(s)>
- **Format:** 30-minute team meeting; round-robin (each person shares one win + one lesson); manager goes last
- **Facilitator:** rotating; manager goes last specifically (Edmondson — manager-first kills psychological safety in subsequent rounds)
- **Success indicator:** ≥ 90% attendance; lessons shared include genuine failures (not curated wins-disguised-as-lessons)
- **Avoid:** manager-led; performative wins-only; skipping when busy (signals it doesn't matter)

### Weekly Ritual B: <name — e.g., "Manager 1:1">
- **Purpose:** psychological safety + individual context + early surfacing of friction
- **SCARF activation:** Relatedness (one-on-one attention), Autonomy (private space to disagree)
- **Reinforces value:** <which>
- **Format:** 30-45 min, weekly, walking or seated, agenda owned by report (not manager)
- **Time-box:** 30-45 min
- **Facilitator:** report drives agenda; manager listens 70% of the time
- **Success indicator:** report regularly brings difficult topics; manager hears bad news early not late
- **Avoid:** status-update meetings disguised as 1:1; manager-driven agenda; cancellation pattern

### Weekly Ritual C: <if applicable>
<same structure>

---

## Section 4 — Monthly rituals (milestone markers)

Lower frequency, higher meaning. Mark progress + reinforce values.

### Monthly Ritual A: <name — e.g., "Peer-recognition ceremony">
- **Purpose:** value-reinforcement via public recognition
- **SCARF activation:** Status (positive recognition), Fairness (peer-nominated reduces favoritism), Relatedness (shared celebration)
- **Reinforces value:** <which operationalized value(s)>
- **Format:** 20 min, anyone can nominate anyone in advance; named recognition with specific behavior + which value it exemplifies
- **Time-box:** 20 min
- **Facilitator:** rotating; CEO does not run this
- **Success indicator:** broad nomination distribution (not the same 5 people every month); recognitions cite specific behavior + value
- **Avoid:** manager-only nominations; vague recognitions ("great job!"); same names recycled

### Monthly Ritual B: <e.g., "Learning showcase">
<same structure>

---

## Section 5 — Quarterly rituals (meaning-making)

Strategic-cadence rituals. Reinforce direction, surface drift, celebrate compound progress.

### Quarterly Ritual A: <name — e.g., "Quarterly retrospective">
- **Purpose:** meaning-making + system-level retrospective + drift detection
- **SCARF activation:** Certainty (clarity on direction), Autonomy (team agency over the next quarter), Fairness (transparent reflection)
- **Reinforces value:** <which>
- **Format:** half-day off-cycle; team-by-team retro followed by cross-team synthesis; CEO present in synthesis only
- **Time-box:** 4 hours
- **Facilitator:** ops or chief-of-staff; outside facilitator for orgs >100
- **Success indicator:** specific system-level changes committed; manager + IC voice present; retro outputs actually drive Q+1 OKRs
- **Avoid:** retro-as-vibes; CEO-led synthesis (kills psychological safety); retros that produce no committed change

### Quarterly Ritual B: <e.g., "Strategy share">
<same structure>

---

## Section 6 — Annual milestones (spikes, not architecture)

Annual events mark time but do not constitute the cultural substrate. Use sparingly and with purpose.

| Milestone | Purpose | Format | What it does NOT do |
|-----------|---------|--------|---------------------|
| Founding day | Origin-story reinforcement | Founder narrative + early-team reflection | Replace weekly rituals; pretend culture is built once a year |
| Annual all-hands | Strategic clarity + vision reinforcement | 60-90 min broadcast + 60 min real dialogue | Substitute for weekly team rhythm |
| Year-in-review | Compound-progress recognition | Data + named contribution stories | Surface yearly performance gaps that should have been addressed quarterly |
| Anniversary recognition | Tenure as belonging signal | Named, specific, contribution-cited | Become a participation trophy |

---

## Section 7 — Distribution map

Which rituals are critical for which roles / locations / patterns?

| Cadence | Onsite | Hybrid | Remote-first |
|---------|--------|--------|--------------|
| Daily | Async standup post | Async standup post + 2x/week in-person sync | Async standup + scheduled video presence 1x/week |
| Weekly | Friday wins + 1:1 | Friday wins + 1:1 + structured async-to-sync handoff | Friday wins (video) + 1:1 + virtual coffee rotation |
| Monthly | Peer-recognition + learning showcase | Same + intentional in-person convening | Same + quarterly in-person gathering substitute |
| Quarterly | Retrospective + strategy share | Same | Same — anchored in scheduled video, supported by written-first context |

---

## Section 8 — Implementation sequence (8 weeks)

- **Weeks 1-2** — Anti-ritual removal (do not add new rituals on top of unkilled anti-rituals)
- **Weeks 3-4** — Weekly rituals launched (substrate first)
- **Weeks 5-6** — Daily + monthly rituals layered
- **Weeks 7-8** — Quarterly + annual baseline established
- **Quarter 2+** — Re-measure psychological safety, attendance, broad nomination distribution

---

## Load-bearing next move

**`/culture-onboarding-90 <role>`** — onboarding is the entry point for every ritual; new hires must encounter the architecture in their first 90 days or they will not internalize it. Default next.

Alternatives:
- `/culture-values-ops <org>` — if rituals revealed value-system gaps (rituals can't reinforce values that aren't operationalized)
- `/culture-design <org>` — if anti-ritual audit revealed audit-level gaps not previously surfaced

---

**Built on SIP** — Starlight Intelligence Protocol
- Substrate: starlightintelligence.org/protocol v1.1.0
- Layers used: [file-contract, attestation, commands, sovereignty]
- Verticals: [email protected] (People Intelligence — Culture, sub-system 4 of 6)
- Generated: <ISO date>
---

Read the full file on GitHub · 226 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 226 lines · 83 tokens per session scan A a66bddec62c9

Subscribe to this mod's changes

culture-rituals is a command published in the GitHub repository frankxai/Starlight-Intelligence-System (8 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 83 tokens to every session and 3,092 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.