org-reorg-trauma-audit

org-reorg-trauma-audit is a command for Claude Code from frankxai/Starlight-Intelligence-System. It costs 100 tokens per session (3,858 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A review and sequencing plan for a proposed company reorganisation, meaning a major change to teams, roles, or reporting lines. It examines how past difficult changes and likely threats may affect people before the reorganisation begins.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to assess whether a reorganisation should proceed, divide it into stages, plan messages, identify team-specific risks, and set up monitoring after each stage.
Why use it?
It helps reveal whether the reorganisation is likely to create more problems than it solves and highlights employment-law and workforce risks that need qualified advice. It also provides a way to plan communication and support instead of treating employee reactions as an afterthought.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter.

Part of the starlight-intelligence-system plugin — 6 skills, 121 commands, 7 agents shipped together

Good fit Use it to assess whether a reorganisation should proceed, divide it into stages, plan messages, identify team-specific risks, and set up monitoring after each stage.

Compare 6 commands from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/frankxai/starlight-intelligence-system/org-reorg-trauma-audit
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/frankxai/Starlight-Intelligence-System

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install starlight-intelligence-system, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 6 skills, 121 commands, 7 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for org-reorg-trauma-audit

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/frankxai/starlight-intelligence-system/org-reorg-trauma-audit/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/frankxai/starlight-intelligence-system/org-reorg-trauma-audit)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/frankxai/starlight-intelligence-system/org-reorg-trauma-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/frankxai/starlight-intelligence-system/org-reorg-trauma-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for org-reorg-trauma-audit

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/frankxai/starlight-intelligence-system/org-reorg-trauma-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/frankxai/starlight-intelligence-system/org-reorg-trauma-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 100 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 3,858 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00100 $0.03858
Opus 5 $0.00050 $0.01929
Sonnet 5 $0.00020 $0.00772
Haiku 4.5 $0.00010 $0.00386

Measured 11d ago against content hash 90a0aea36fe1, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

org-reorg-trauma-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/commands/org-reorg-trauma-audit.md · 256 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 256 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

/org-reorg-trauma-audit

Load SIP.md, agents/starlight-org.md, skills/people-intelligence/org-architecture.md. Read any prior people-intelligence/org/ outputs and any Talent IS signals available. Produce a Reorg Trauma Audit + Sequencing Plan. May refuse the reorg outright. Hand off to exactly one next command.

Disclaimer (non-waivable)

Reorgs implicate severance, role classification, protected-class concentration in cuts (age, gender, race, disability, parental status, tenure), and jurisdictional employment-law variation. This document is structural thinking architecture, not legal advice. Real reorg decisions require qualified employment counsel before any communication or action.

The number you must hear first (non-negotiable)

McKinsey-class research consistently finds 70%+ of organizational reorganizations fail to deliver their promised outcomes. Roughly half create more dysfunction than they solve. This is not a hedge or a footnote. It is the design constraint this audit operates under.

The implication: if your reorg's case is shaky on its merits, the base rate says it will fail. The audit's job is to honestly tell you which side of that 70/30 your specific reorg sits on, and what would have to be true for it to land in the 30%.

Input

$ARGUMENTS

Flags

  • --reorg-scope <team|department|division|company-wide> — how much of the org the change touches. Larger scope = exponentially higher trauma cost.
  • --proposed-timeline <weeks|months> — proposed announce-to-live window. Weeks = high-threat (closer to surprise). Months = sequencing room.

Process

  1. Lead with the 70%+ failure rate. First thing the user reads. Not buried.

  2. Vision-fit pre-check. Before any audit work, ask: is the underlying issue actually a vision problem? Symptoms suggesting yes: "we're not aligned," "teams are working at cross purposes," "we don't know what we are anymore," "the strategy keeps shifting." If yes, refuse to proceed with reorg sequencing and route to /define-vision or substrate-level vision work. Reorg cannot fix vision drift; it amplifies it. Name this honestly even if the user pushes back.

Read the full file on GitHub · 256 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago First seen · 256 lines · 100 tokens per session scan A 90a0aea36fe1

Subscribe to this mod's changes

org-reorg-trauma-audit is a command published in the GitHub repository frankxai/Starlight-Intelligence-System (8 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 100 tokens to every session and 3,858 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.