Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to frap129/opencode-rules. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/frap129/opencode-rules/main/.opencode/command/openspec-apply.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/frap129/opencode-rulesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/frap129/opencode-rules/openspec-apply)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/frap129/opencode-rules/openspec-apply"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/frap129/opencode-rules/openspec-apply/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/frap129/opencode-rules/openspec-apply"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/frap129/opencode-rules/openspec-apply.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00012 | $0.00281 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00112 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00056 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00028 |
Grade A, and why
openspec-apply scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
91% identical to openspec-apply — 3 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Guardrails
- Favor straightforward, minimal implementations first and add complexity only when it is requested or clearly required.
- Keep changes tightly scoped to the requested outcome.
- Refer to
openspec/AGENTS.md(located inside theopenspec/directory—runls openspecoropenspec updateif you don't see it) if you need additional OpenSpec conventions or clarifications.
Steps Track these steps as TODOs and complete them one by one.
- Read
changes/<id>/proposal.md,design.md(if present), andtasks.mdto confirm scope and acceptance criteria. - Work through tasks sequentially, keeping edits minimal and focused on the requested change.
- Confirm completion before updating statuses—make sure every item in
tasks.mdis finished. - Update the checklist after all work is done so each task is marked
- [x]and reflects reality. - Reference
openspec listoropenspec show <item>when additional context is required.
Reference
- Use
openspec show <id> --json --deltas-onlyif you need additional context from the proposal while implementing.
$ARGUMENTS
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 24 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A 24cbf49c9649
openspec-apply is a command published in the GitHub repository frap129/opencode-rules (119 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 281 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 91% identical to openspec-apply, differing in 3 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.
speckit.bug.fix
Apply the remediation from a bug assessment and record what was changed.
speckit.bug.test
Validate that a previously fixed bug is resolved and record the verification report.