Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Fujigo-Software/f5-framework-claudeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/fujigo-software/f5-framework-claude/f5-codebase)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/fujigo-software/f5-framework-claude/f5-codebase"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/fujigo-software/f5-framework-claude/f5-codebase/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/fujigo-software/f5-framework-claude/f5-codebase"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/fujigo-software/f5-framework-claude/f5-codebase.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00011 | $0.00190 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00076 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00038 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00019 |
Grade A, and why
f5-codebase scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
⚠️ DEPRECATED: /f5-codebase
This command has been consolidated into /f5-memory codebase.
Migration
# Old (deprecated)
/f5-codebase index
/f5-codebase search "authentication logic"
/f5-codebase find "user validation"
/f5-codebase similar "<code>"
/f5-codebase stats
/f5-codebase reset
# New (use this instead)
/f5-memory codebase index
/f5-memory codebase search "authentication logic"
/f5-memory codebase find "user validation"
/f5-memory codebase similar "<code>"
/f5-memory codebase stats
/f5-memory codebase reset
Automatic Redirect
Executing /f5-memory codebase $ARGUMENTS...
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 33 lines · 11 tokens per session scan A 315903942566
f5-codebase is a command published in the GitHub repository Fujigo-Software/f5-framework-claude (24 stars, last pushed 8mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 11 tokens to every session and 190 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
plan
Project spec (no args) or feature FRD (with args).
debug
Structured debugging with parallel investigation agents.
init
Analyze codebase and generate CLAUDE.md with project conventions.
release
Generate changelog, bump version, and create git tag.
docs
Generate or update project documentation from codebase and specs.
review
Multi-agent code review with parallel validation.