Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fusengine/agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/fusengine/agents/run-tasks)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/fusengine/agents/run-tasks"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/fusengine/agents/run-tasks/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/fusengine/agents/run-tasks"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/fusengine/agents/run-tasks.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00023 | $0.00398 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00159 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00080 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00040 |
Grade A, and why
run-tasks scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Run GitHub Issue Tasks
Execute GitHub issue with complete EPCT workflow:
-
Fetch Issue Details:
gh issue view $ARGUMENTSExtract:
- Issue title and description
- Acceptance criteria
- Labels and priority
- Related issues/PRs
-
Execute EPCT: Run
/epct [ISSUE_TITLE]workflow:EXPLORE: Understand affected components PLAN: Design solution CODE: Implement changes TEST: Validate implementation
-
Create Branch:
git checkout -b issue-$ISSUE_NUMBER-[slug] -
Commit Changes:
git commit -m "$(cat <<'EOF' feat: [ISSUE_TITLE] Fixes #$ISSUE_NUMBER - [Change 1] - [Change 2] EOF )" -
Create PR:
gh pr create --title "Fixes #$ISSUE_NUMBER: [TITLE]" --body "$(cat <<'EOF' ## Summary Resolves #$ISSUE_NUMBER ## Changes [List of changes] ## Test Plan [How tested] EOF )" -
Link Issue:
gh issue comment $ISSUE_NUMBER --body "PR created: [PR_URL]"
Arguments:
- $ARGUMENTS = GitHub issue number
Example Usage:
/run-tasks 42→ Execute issue #42 with full workflow
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 75 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A 1bead1721605
run-tasks is a command published in the GitHub repository fusengine/agents (31 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 398 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
migrate-ledger
(Ledger) Move a pre-2.0 in-repo Agile-Ledger/ folder into the ledger repo, then clean the code repo.
ledger-commit
(Ledger) Review and commit the ledger repo's changes (push only on confirmation).
register-repo
(Ledger) Register a code repo into the ledger — its folder + the eight files + a Registry row.
init-ledger
(Ledger) Create the ledger repository — Registry + Config — the one-time setup.
flow
Universal workflow entry point. Use /flow for skill-driven GitHub development. Verbs: start, commit, pr, review, address, merge, resolve, release, status, learn, setup, explain, debug, design, brainstorm, issue.
weekly-review
Produce a weekly review from the evidence in the repository and the workspace: commits and pull requests merged or open, issues closed and opened, decisions logged, research log entries, action items done and overdue, and what stalled, then a short plan for next week; written to a dated file so reviews accumulate. Use…