Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to g-digital-by-Garrigues/EAD_Enterprise_Suite_MCP. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/g-digital-by-Garrigues/EAD_Enterprise_Suite_MCP/main/.claude/commands/signature-lifecycle.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/g-digital-by-Garrigues/EAD_Enterprise_Suite_MCPWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/g-digital-by-garrigues/ead_enterprise_suite_mcp/signature-lifecycle)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/g-digital-by-garrigues/ead_enterprise_suite_mcp/signature-lifecycle"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/g-digital-by-garrigues/ead_enterprise_suite_mcp/signature-lifecycle/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/g-digital-by-garrigues/ead_enterprise_suite_mcp/signature-lifecycle"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/g-digital-by-garrigues/ead_enterprise_suite_mcp/signature-lifecycle.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.02192 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.01096 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00438 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00219 |
Grade A, and why
signature-lifecycle scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 214 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Signature Lifecycle (EAD Enterprise Suite)
Manage the full digital signature workflow via EAD Enterprise Suite.
Step-by-step path
Use the individual tools when you need custom control over each step.
Key concepts
- Signature types:
INTERPOSITION(electronic, placement box) orADVANCED(qualified, requires a digital certificate from the signer). - Close condition:
ALL_REQUIRED(everyone must sign) orPARTIAL_ALLOWED(first signer closes it). - Sequence:
PARALLEL(all sign simultaneously) orCONFIGURABLE(ordered signing). - WhatsApp/simple signing link: currently only supported for
INTERPOSITION(simple signature).ADVANCEDdoes not currently support WhatsApp delivery. - Advanced OTP:
ADVANCEDsignatures requirephonePrefixandphoneNumber; the signer receives the OTP through that phone channel. - Document states: DRAFT → processing →
READY_TO_SIGN. Must beREADY_TO_SIGNbefore activation. - Coordinates: Required for all signature types (both
INTERPOSITIONandADVANCED). Set before activation viasignature_coordinate_set.
IDs you need before starting
caseFileId— fromcase_file_list(use theidUUID, not the code like PR82)userId— returned bysession_info(no parameters needed)
Step 1 — Create the signature request
signature_request_create(
caseFileId: "<uuid>",
id: "<new-uuid>",
name: "My Signature Request",
language: "es_ES",
deadline: "2026-06-30T23:59:59.000Z",
signatureType: "INTERPOSITION",
closeCondition: "ALL_REQUIRED",
sequence: "PARALLEL"
)
Returns {} on success (the id you provided becomes the requestId).
Step 2 — Register document
signature_request_add_document(
caseFileId: "<uuid>",
requestId: "<sig-request-uuid>",
id: "<new-uuid>",
title: "Document Title",
fileName: "document.pdf",
fileSize: <bytes>,
hash: "<sha256-hex>" # SHA-256 hex digest of the file
)
Returns { url: "<presigned-s3-url>" }. The documentId is the id you passed in this call.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago Changed · +46 lines 0da3f41ed9f5
- 11d ago First seen · 168 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A dedc5cc1a663
signature-lifecycle is a command published in the GitHub repository g-digital-by-Garrigues/EAD_Enterprise_Suite_MCP (0 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 2,192 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
deps-audit
Audit project dependencies for vulnerabilities, outdated packages, license conflicts, and supply chain risks — then provide actionable remediation strategies.
review-epo-claims
Analyze patent claims for EPO Art. 84 EPC compliance - clarity, conciseness, support by description.
voice-compliance
Voice/telephony compliance check — invokes voice-ai-reviewer to produce TM-voice-{slug}.md with TCPA, STIR/SHAKEN, state recording-consent, EU AI Act Art. 50, and synth-voice deepfake-law gaps.
review-policy
Review a policy document for structure, coverage, and language quality.
at-dsgvo
You are helping an enterprise architect generate an Austrian Data Protection Assessment — the Austrian-specific GDPR layer applied by the Datenschutzbehörde (DSB) under the Datenschutzgesetz (DSG 2018, BGBl. I Nr. 165/1999 as amended). Run this after /arckit:eu-rgpd to add Austrian obligations that go beyond the EU…
au-pspf
You are an enterprise architect generating a Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) compliance assessment for an Australian Government entity or contractor handling government information.