Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to g-digital-by-Garrigues/GoCertius_MCP. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/g-digital-by-Garrigues/GoCertius_MCP/main/.claude/commands/chat-lifecycle.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/g-digital-by-Garrigues/GoCertius_MCPWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/g-digital-by-garrigues/gocertius_mcp/chat-lifecycle)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/g-digital-by-garrigues/gocertius_mcp/chat-lifecycle"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/g-digital-by-garrigues/gocertius_mcp/chat-lifecycle/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/g-digital-by-garrigues/gocertius_mcp/chat-lifecycle"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/g-digital-by-garrigues/gocertius_mcp/chat-lifecycle.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.01079 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00540 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00216 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00108 |
Grade A, and why
chat-lifecycle scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 73 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Certified Chat Lifecycle
Create a Telegram-based certified chat session and generate a tamper-evident certificate of the conversation.
Key constraint
Chats can only be created in the user's personal case file — the case file created automatically when the GoCertius account was opened. Creating a chat in any other case file is not supported by the platform even if the API accepts the call. Use session_info → case_file_list to find the personal case file (typically the oldest one, owned by the user).
Flow
-
Find the personal case file
session_info→ getuserIdcase_file_listwithuserId→ find the personal case file (oldestcreatedAt, owned by the user)- Note its
idandcode
-
Create the chat
chat_createwith a generated UUIDid,caseFileId,title,service: "Telegram",language- Optional:
serviceTitle(shown in Telegram) andserviceDescription - The chat starts in
creatingstatus; it transitions toactiveonce the Telegram bot is registered
-
Get the invitation URL
- First call
chat_getand wait until the chat is no longercreatingandregisteredAtis present. Calling too early can returnChat not foundeven thoughchat_createaccepted the request. chat_invitation_urlwithcaseFileIdandchatId- Returns
{ invitationUrl: "https://t.me/+..." }— share this link with all participants - Participants join the Telegram group; the GoCertius bot records all messages
- First call
-
Participants chat
- All messages sent in the Telegram group are captured by the GoCertius bot
- Note:
chatMessagesFromfor the certificate must be after the chat'sregisteredAttimestamp (visible viachat_get) createdAtis not a valid substitute forregisteredAt; ifregisteredAtis missing, wait or ask the user to join/register the chat through the invitation flow before creating a certificate.
-
Create the certificate
chat_certificate_createwith a generated UUIDid,caseFileId,chatId,name,languagechatMessagesFrom: ISO datetime — must be strictly after the chat'sregisteredAt(usechat_getto confirm; setting it to exactlyregisteredAtor before causes validation error)chatMessagesTo: ISO datetime — can be now or any future point- The certificate is generated asynchronously but typically certifies within seconds
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 73 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 33f45a7bc0dd
chat-lifecycle is a command published in the GitHub repository g-digital-by-Garrigues/GoCertius_MCP (0 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,079 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
deps-audit
Audit project dependencies for vulnerabilities, outdated packages, license conflicts, and supply chain risks — then provide actionable remediation strategies.
review-epo-claims
Analyze patent claims for EPO Art. 84 EPC compliance - clarity, conciseness, support by description.
voice-compliance
Voice/telephony compliance check — invokes voice-ai-reviewer to produce TM-voice-{slug}.md with TCPA, STIR/SHAKEN, state recording-consent, EU AI Act Art. 50, and synth-voice deepfake-law gaps.
review-policy
Review a policy document for structure, coverage, and language quality.
at-dsgvo
You are helping an enterprise architect generate an Austrian Data Protection Assessment — the Austrian-specific GDPR layer applied by the Datenschutzbehörde (DSB) under the Datenschutzgesetz (DSG 2018, BGBl. I Nr. 165/1999 as amended). Run this after /arckit:eu-rgpd to add Austrian obligations that go beyond the EU…
au-pspf
You are an enterprise architect generating a Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) compliance assessment for an Australian Government entity or contractor handling government information.