Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/GAJETOso/financeskillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/gajetoso/financeskills/close-the-books)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/gajetoso/financeskills/close-the-books"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/gajetoso/financeskills/close-the-books/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/gajetoso/financeskills/close-the-books"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/gajetoso/financeskills/close-the-books.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00171 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00086 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00034 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00017 |
Grade A, and why
close-the-books scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Execute the orchestrated close in workflows/month-end-close.md for: $ARGUMENTS
Work phase by phase (Plan -> Entries -> Reconciliations -> Statements -> Review pack). Do not start a phase until the prior phase's gate is met; state each gate check. Use each phase's skill (skills//SKILL.md), compute exclusively with their scripts/calculate.py functions, and format outputs on their assets/ templates. If an input file is missing for a phase, list exactly what is needed and pause that phase rather than estimating silently.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 13 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 0c2ad551e705
close-the-books is a command published in the GitHub repository GAJETOso/financeskills (20 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 171 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
tax-review
Tax-filing compliance check — invokes tax-reviewer to produce TM-tax-{slug}.md with MeF e-file schema, Form 8879, PTIN/Circular 230, and IRC §7216 consent gaps.
assess
Review the book and report what the numbers actually show — run rate, categories, changes, unusual entries, and gaps in the data.
widget-lint
Analyzes SAC custom widget code for performance issues, security concerns, and best practice violations.
pr-description
Write a pull request description that helps reviewers: what changed, why, and how to verify, from a diff.
review-security
Review code or a design for security weaknesses, ranked by real exploitability rather than by checklist coverage.
financial-health
Assess financial health of a SaaS business using key metrics.