Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/galando/temper/reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/galando/temperWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00683 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00342 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00137 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00068 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 60 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Review: Confidence-Scored Code Review
Goal: Review changes with parallel subagents, confidence scoring, and intent validation.
Execution
Full methodology: Read
$CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT/reference/review.md
Subprocess Mode
If $CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT/scripts/temper config get stages.subprocess false returns
true, don't run the methodology inline (skip the reference read and Quick Reference
below). Launch the same isolated subprocess /temper uses — model from temper model review, prompt: "Follow $CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT/agents/review.md exactly. Spec:
.temper/specs/{feature-slug}. Standalone run — pass --spec-path
.temper/specs/{feature-slug} to every temper gate call." Print the returned box
verbatim, then run the gate + AskUserQuestion per Deterministic Gate below (the
subprocess already recorded each open finding as evidence) — the human gate stays in
this context either way.
Quick Reference
- Gather changed files + active pack rules + review memory
- Launch parallel review subagents (backend/frontend/security)
- Structured intent validation: mechanical checks (scenario/code) + deferred (metric/manual)
- Filter by confidence threshold + review memory
- Generate report to
.temper/reviews/ - Auto-fix high-priority issues (if enabled, max 2 loops)
- Update metrics + review memory
- Run
$CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT/scripts/temper gate review --spec-path .temper/specs/{feature-slug}and show its PASS/FAIL viaAskUserQuestion— see Deterministic Gate below
Active Skills
- Context Engineering — load hierarchical context at stage start (rules → arch → source → errors, under 2K lines/task)
- Temper Core — stack detection, pack resolution, quality gates
Diff-aware: focuses on what changed, catches N+1 and performance issues
Deterministic Gate
This is the same gate the unified /temper command's Review stage runs — running this
command standalone must not skip it, or temper gate commit sees no review evidence and
wrongly blocks (or wrongly passes) a later commit. Follow
$CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT/agents/review.md steps 2-3 (record each open finding via temper evidence add --stage review --severity ...) as you review, then run
$CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT/scripts/temper gate review and show its PASS/FAIL to the user via
AskUserQuestion (this command is not a subprocess — you own the gate here, unlike
agents/review.md's "never show a gate" rule).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 60 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A 609d47da7ce9
review is a command published in the GitHub repository galando/temper (15 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 683 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.
implement
Execute the implementation plan by processing and executing all tasks defined in tasks.md.