gx-review-di

gx-review-di is a command for Claude Code from galaxyproject/claude-galaxy-plugins. It costs 0 tokens per session (1,368 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A command that reviews Python code for dependency injection, a way of supplying a component's required services from outside instead of having it create or fetch them itself. It accepts a folder, commit, file list, or planning document.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to check that Galaxy code uses constructor-based Lagom injection, keeps service layers separate, and avoids adding unnecessary properties to the application object.
Why use it?
It helps prevent a central application object from becoming a hard-to-test object that every part of the system depends on.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the gx-arch-review plugin — 12 commands shipped together

Good fit Use it to check that Galaxy code uses constructor-based Lagom injection, keeps service layers separate, and avoids adding unnecessary properties to the application object.

Compare 6 commands from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/galaxyproject/claude-galaxy-plugins/gx-review-di
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/galaxyproject/claude-galaxy-plugins

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install gx-arch-review, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 12 commands.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for gx-review-di

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/galaxyproject/claude-galaxy-plugins/gx-review-di/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/galaxyproject/claude-galaxy-plugins/gx-review-di)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/galaxyproject/claude-galaxy-plugins/gx-review-di"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/galaxyproject/claude-galaxy-plugins/gx-review-di/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for gx-review-di

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/galaxyproject/claude-galaxy-plugins/gx-review-di"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/galaxyproject/claude-galaxy-plugins/gx-review-di.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 0 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,368 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00000 $0.01368
Opus 5 $0.00000 $0.00684
Sonnet 5 $0.00000 $0.00274
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00137

Measured 10d ago against content hash b6db9efde625, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-10, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

gx-review-di scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/gx-arch-review/commands/gx-review-di.md · 183 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 183 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Review Galaxy Code for Dependency Injection Best Practices

Perform a Python code review on the provided code. Accept input in any of the following forms:

  1. A working directory path (analyze git diff in that directory)
  2. A Git commit reference (analyze changes in that commit)
  3. A list of Python file paths (analyze those files)
  4. A planning document (analyze the Python files in the plan)

Review Criteria

Review the code and ensure it follows best practices for dependency injection in Galaxy:

  1. Avoid FastAPI-style injection - Prefer Galaxy-style DI using Lagom and type-based injection
  2. Proper service/manager layer dependencies - Dependencies should be injected via constructors, not via app access
  3. Avoid app property creation - Don't add new properties to the app object when DI can be used

Galaxy DI Architecture Background

The Problem: God Object Anti-pattern

Galaxy's app object was historically a "god object" - an object that knows/does too much. Every component, controller, and web transaction had a reference to app. This creates:

  • Circular dependencies (manager imports UniverseApplication, which creates that manager)
  • Difficult testing (hard to know what parts of app are needed, hard to mock)
  • Brittle construction ordering

The Solution: Type-based Dependency Injection

Galaxy uses Lagom for type-based DI:

  • Container keeps track of singletons and construction recipes
  • Dependencies are resolved automatically based on type annotations
  • Dependencies should form a DAG (directed acyclic graph)

Interface Pattern for Breaking Cycles

Use StructuredApp interface instead of UniverseApplication to break circular dependencies:

# BAD - creates circular dependency
class MyManager:
    def __init__(self, app: UniverseApplication):
        ...

# GOOD - uses interface, breaks cycle
class MyManager:
    def __init__(self, app: StructuredApp):
        ...

# BETTER - inject only what you need
class MyManager:
    def __init__(self, model: GalaxyModelMapping, security: IdEncodingHelper):
        ...

Read the full file on GitHub · 183 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 10d ago First seen · 183 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A b6db9efde625

Subscribe to this mod's changes

gx-review-di is a command published in the GitHub repository galaxyproject/claude-galaxy-plugins (4 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,368 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.