Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/galaxyproject/claude-galaxy-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/galaxyproject/claude-galaxy-plugins/gx-review-di)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/galaxyproject/claude-galaxy-plugins/gx-review-di"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/galaxyproject/claude-galaxy-plugins/gx-review-di/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/galaxyproject/claude-galaxy-plugins/gx-review-di"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/galaxyproject/claude-galaxy-plugins/gx-review-di.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.01368 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00684 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00274 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00137 |
Grade A, and why
gx-review-di scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 183 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Review Galaxy Code for Dependency Injection Best Practices
Perform a Python code review on the provided code. Accept input in any of the following forms:
- A working directory path (analyze git diff in that directory)
- A Git commit reference (analyze changes in that commit)
- A list of Python file paths (analyze those files)
- A planning document (analyze the Python files in the plan)
Review Criteria
Review the code and ensure it follows best practices for dependency injection in Galaxy:
- Avoid FastAPI-style injection - Prefer Galaxy-style DI using Lagom and type-based injection
- Proper service/manager layer dependencies - Dependencies should be injected via constructors, not via
appaccess - Avoid
appproperty creation - Don't add new properties to theappobject when DI can be used
Galaxy DI Architecture Background
The Problem: God Object Anti-pattern
Galaxy's app object was historically a "god object" - an object that knows/does too much. Every component, controller, and web transaction had a reference to app. This creates:
- Circular dependencies (manager imports
UniverseApplication, which creates that manager) - Difficult testing (hard to know what parts of
appare needed, hard to mock) - Brittle construction ordering
The Solution: Type-based Dependency Injection
Galaxy uses Lagom for type-based DI:
- Container keeps track of singletons and construction recipes
- Dependencies are resolved automatically based on type annotations
- Dependencies should form a DAG (directed acyclic graph)
Interface Pattern for Breaking Cycles
Use StructuredApp interface instead of UniverseApplication to break circular dependencies:
# BAD - creates circular dependency
class MyManager:
def __init__(self, app: UniverseApplication):
...
# GOOD - uses interface, breaks cycle
class MyManager:
def __init__(self, app: StructuredApp):
...
# BETTER - inject only what you need
class MyManager:
def __init__(self, model: GalaxyModelMapping, security: IdEncodingHelper):
...
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 183 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A b6db9efde625
gx-review-di is a command published in the GitHub repository galaxyproject/claude-galaxy-plugins (4 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,368 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
notebook-review
Comprehensive review of Jupyter notebooks and Python scripts.
python-review
Comprehensive Python code review for PEP 8 compliance, type hints, security, and Pythonic idioms. Invokes the python-reviewer agent.
review-uv-script
Review uv Python script for PEP 723 compliance and best practices.
review-python-code
A command for reviewing Python code for style, type annotations, reliability, performance, and project rules. PEP 8 is the commonly used guide for formatting and writing readable Python.
review-react-code
A command that reviews React and TypeScript code, including how components are organised, how Hooks are used, how state is handled, and how the code performs.
py-harden
Scan Python backend code for anti-patterns and fix them. Runs the full anti-pattern catalog (AP-01 through AP-22) against the codebase.