Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to gaoconggit/SharpPad. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/gaoconggit/SharpPad/main/.claude/commands/kiro/validate-design.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gaoconggit/SharpPadWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/gaoconggit/sharppad/validate-design)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/gaoconggit/sharppad/validate-design"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/gaoconggit/sharppad/validate-design/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/gaoconggit/sharppad/validate-design"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/gaoconggit/sharppad/validate-design.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00007 | $0.01333 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00533 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00267 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00133 |
Grade A, and why
validate-design scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
95% identical to validate-design — 2 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 180 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Technical Design Validation
Interactive design quality review for feature: $1
Context Loading
Prerequisites Validation
- Design document must exist:
.kiro/specs/$1/design.md - If not exist, stop with message: "Run
/kiro:spec-design $1first to generate design document"
Review Context
- Spec metadata: @.kiro/specs/$1/spec.json
- Requirements document: @.kiro/specs/$1/requirements.md
- Design document: @.kiro/specs/$1/design.md
- Core steering documents:
- Architecture: @.kiro/steering/structure.md
- Technology: @.kiro/steering/tech.md
- Product context: @.kiro/steering/product.md
- Custom steering: All additional
.mdfiles in.kiro/steering/directory
Task: Interactive Design Quality Review
Review Methodology
Focus: Critical issues only - limit to 3 most important concerns Format: Interactive dialogue with immediate feedback and improvement suggestions Outcome: GO/NO-GO decision with clear rationale
Core Review Criteria
1. Existing Architecture Alignment (Critical)
Evaluation Points:
- Integration with existing system boundaries and layers
- Consistency with established architectural patterns
- Proper dependency direction and coupling management
- Alignment with current module organization and responsibilities
Review Questions:
- Does this design respect existing architectural boundaries?
- Are new components properly integrated with existing systems?
- Does the design follow established patterns and conventions?
2. Design Consistency & Standards
Evaluation Points:
- Adherence to project naming conventions and code standards
- Consistent error handling and logging strategies
- Uniform approach to configuration and dependency management
- Alignment with established data modeling patterns
Review Questions:
- Is the design consistent with existing code standards?
- Are error handling and configuration approaches unified?
- Does naming and structure follow project conventions?
3. Extensibility & Maintainability
Evaluation Points:
- Design flexibility for future requirements changes
- Clear separation of concerns and single responsibility principle
- Testability and debugging considerations
- Documentation and code clarity requirements
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 13d ago First seen · 180 lines · 7 tokens per session scan A 3fca02abb7cd
validate-design is a command published in the GitHub repository gaoconggit/SharpPad (83 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 7 tokens to every session and 1,333 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 95% identical to validate-design, differing in 2 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
step6-ship
Pipeline Step 6 — Ship the completed phase: commit, update roadmap, capture postmortem, optionally push and create PR.
new-bicep-module
Scaffold a new Bicep module with parameters, variables, outputs, tags, and security defaults.
ship-changes
../../.cratis/ai/prompts/ship-changes.prompt.md.
record
Record the browser while validating a flow, then judge it against a rubric.
watch
Open a YouTube URL in your browser so the watcher plugin can auto play/pause it.
security
Scan a .NET project for security vulnerabilities and dependency health issues.