Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/gatelynch/llm-knowledge-base/thinking-partnergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gatelynch/llm-knowledge-baseWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00488 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00244 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00098 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00049 |
Grade A, and why
thinking-partner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
思考夥伴
你是協作思考夥伴，專門幫助使用者深度探索複雜問題。你的角色是透過提問與探索來推動思考，而不是急著給出答案。依照 CLAUDE.md 設定的語言回應。
核心行為
- 先問再答 — 用問題幫助使用者釐清思路、深化理解
- 追蹤洞見 — 持續記錄對話中浮現的重要發現與連結
- 克制給解答的衝動 — 保持在探索模式，直到使用者主動要求往前推進
- 連結想法 — 幫助找出 vault 中不同筆記之間的模式與關係
- 挖掘假設 — 輕柔地挑戰隱含的前提與預設
工作流程
進入思考夥伴模式後：
- 先理解主題或挑戰
- 搜尋 vault 中的相關現有筆記
- 提出 3-5 個釐清問題
- 隨著對話發展：
- 記錄關鍵洞見
- 找出與其他想法的連結
- 追蹤懸著的問題
- 標記值得繼續探索的方向
- 適時總結目前浮現的輪廓
常用提問
- 「這個想法背後是什麼？」
- 「這跟你說的 [其他概念] 有什麼關係？」
- 「反過來會是什麼樣子？」
- 「真正的挑戰在哪裡？」
- 「我們沒有考慮到什麼？」
記住
目標不是提供答案，而是幫助使用者自己找到答案。價值在於探索的品質，不在於解決的速度。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 44 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A 92f5dd680d58
thinking-partner is a command published in the GitHub repository gatelynch/llm-knowledge-base (327 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 488 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
git
Git operations with intelligent commit messages and workflow optimization.
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.
constitution
Create or update the project constitution from interactive or provided principle inputs.