gentle-sdd-continue

gentle-sdd-continue is a command for Claude Code from Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai. It costs 10 tokens per session (858 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of sdd-continue, MIT.

A command for continuing the next phase of an SDD workflow, where SDD means specification-driven development: planning and implementing software from written specifications.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when a project has an SDD change in progress and you need to advance to its next phase.
Why use it?
It helps determine and continue the next dependent step in an ongoing development workflow.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: $ARGUMENTS substitution. Also seen: reads .claude/ paths; mentions subagents; mentions Claude Code.

Good fit Use it when a project has an SDD change in progress and you need to advance to its next phase.

Compare 6 commands from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/gentleman-programming/gentle-ai/gentle-sdd-continue
About the project

Gentle-AI configures an existing AI coding agent into an engineering environment with persistent memory, planning workflows, skills, tool servers, model routing, and optional review. Developers and teams use it to make coding agents follow project conventions and retain decisions across sessions. The catalogue entries are its skills, commands, agents, and instruction.

Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai · 6,328 stars · on GitHub · gentle-ai.gentlemanprogramming.com

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for gentle-sdd-continue

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/gentleman-programming/gentle-ai/gentle-sdd-continue.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/gentleman-programming/gentle-ai/gentle-sdd-continue)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/gentleman-programming/gentle-ai/gentle-sdd-continue"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/gentleman-programming/gentle-ai/gentle-sdd-continue.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 10 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 858 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 88% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00010 $0.00858
Opus 5 $0.00005 $0.00429
Sonnet 5 $0.00002 $0.00172
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00086

Measured 4d ago against content hash 2e590958cac7, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

gentle-sdd-continue scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

88% identical to sdd-continue — 28 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

internal/assets/claude/commands/gentle-sdd-continue.md · 36 lines

What it actually says

Read the SDD workflow FIRST: .claude/skills/_shared/sdd-orchestrator-workflow.md under the workspace when a workspace-scope install wrote it there, otherwise ~/.claude/skills/_shared/sdd-orchestrator-workflow.md. Then treat it as the authoritative SDD workflow instructions for this command. The Claude Code session model is controlled by Claude Code; Gentle AI's always-on Model Assignments policy resolves every Agent tool call, including generic/organic delegation through default.

WORKFLOW:

  1. If the gentle-ai binary is available, run gentle-ai sdd-continue [change] --cwd <repo> and treat its dispatcher/status output as authoritative — but only when the session artifact store is openspec or hybrid. When the session artifact store is engram, do NOT invoke the native dispatcher at all — it cannot see the change (it reads only openspec/changes/); resolve status entirely from Engram (mem_search + mem_get_observation on the change's topic keys) using the manual status schema in ~/.claude/skills/_shared/sdd-status-contract.md (the same schema used when the binary is unavailable). The dispatcher is authoritative only for openspec/hybrid. If unavailable, read ~/.claude/skills/_shared/sdd-status-contract.md and produce structured status before acting.
  2. Resolve the active change. If $ARGUMENTS is missing and more than one active change exists, ask the user to choose and STOP. Do not guess.
  3. Check which artifacts already exist for the active change (proposal, specs, design, tasks)
  4. Determine the next phase needed based on the dependency graph: proposal → [specs ∥ design] → tasks → apply → verify → archive
  5. Launch the appropriate sub-agent(s) for the next phase only if authoritative status says the dependency is ready. Route only by nextRecommended and dependency states; never infer from free text. If blockedReasons is non-empty, do not proceed to apply, archive, or terminal work. If nextRecommended is verify, verification/remediation may run only to refresh evidence; if nextRecommended is resolve-blockers, report blockedReasons and stop; if nextRecommended is a planning token (propose, spec, design, or tasks), launch the corresponding planning phase. Carry actionContext and allowed edit roots into any sub-agent launch.
  6. Present the result and ask the user to proceed

CONTEXT:

  • Working directory: Detect agent-side before proceeding by running git rev-parse --show-toplevel with the Bash tool; if that fails, run pwd with the Bash tool.
  • Current project: Derive agent-side from the detected working directory basename. Do not use slash-command shell interpolation for this value.
  • Change name: $ARGUMENTS
  • Execution mode: ask/cache per orchestrator
  • Artifact store mode: ask/cache per orchestrator
  • Delivery strategy: ask/cache per orchestrator

ENGRAM NOTE: To check which artifacts exist, search: mem_search(query: "sdd/$ARGUMENTS/", project: "{project}") to list all artifacts for this change. Sub-agents handle persistence automatically with topic_key "sdd/$ARGUMENTS/{type}".

Use the lazy workflow instructions to coordinate this workflow. Do NOT execute phase work inline when a native sub-agent is available.

STATUS CONTRACT:

Prefer gentle-ai sdd-continue [change] --cwd <repo> when available — but only when the session artifact store is openspec or hybrid; when the store is engram, do NOT invoke the binary and resolve status from Engram using the manual status schema. Otherwise read ~/.claude/skills/_shared/sdd-status-contract.md and follow it. If status reports workspace-planning with no allowed edit roots, do not launch apply/verify/archive work that would infer repo-local ownership.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 4d ago Changed 2e590958cac7
  2. 5d ago First seen · 36 lines · 10 tokens per session scan A 21e45577cdea

Subscribe to this mod's changes

gentle-sdd-continue is a command published in the GitHub repository Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai (6,328 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 858 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 88% identical to sdd-continue, differing in 28 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other commands, from other repositories

cross-audit

Second-model review. Picks an auditor (codex/gemini/opencode/aider/copilot), excludes the caller, writes a prompt to paste, reads the response back. Usage: /cross-audit [--with | list | compare].

FerroxLabs/ijfw · 55 tokens

cross-critique

Adversarial multi-angle critique. All three auditors fire in parallel (codex=technical, gemini=strategic, claude=ux). Counter-args ranked by rebuttal survival score, not raw severity. Usage: /cross-critique [--with | list | compare].

FerroxLabs/ijfw · 65 tokens

make

Refresh, reconfigure, or extend the project's harness at /.claude/. Asks the user what they want to do before invoking the CLI.

Ecro/harness-maker · 0 tokens

repo-consistency-sweep

Proactive defect-class detection that handles the lower-value half of code review (per Bacchelli and Bird 2013) so human reviewers stay focused on design, intent, and knowledge transfer. Catches convention drift, ordering bugs, type-safety gaps, security and multi-tenant invariants (CWE-grounded), and operability…

Mozurok/fhorja.dev · 200 tokens

pr-feedback-ingest

Turn PR feedback (Greptile, CI, bots, humans) into a structured traceable backlog aligned with TASKSTATE.md, DECISIONS.md, and IMPLEMENTATIONPLAN.md so the next execution step can be a narrow implement-approved-slice or a small planning touch without losing alignment. Corrective scope only. Use when a PR is open or…

Mozurok/fhorja.dev · 230 tokens

code-review

Run parallel specialized review agents and produce aggregated quality report.

zxpmail/ReqForge · 10 tokens