Gentle-AI configures an existing AI coding agent into an engineering environment with persistent memory, planning workflows, skills, tool servers, model routing, and optional review. Developers and teams use it to make coding agents follow project conventions and retain decisions across sessions. The catalogue entries are its skills, commands, agents, and instruction.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Gentleman-Programming/gentle-aiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/gentleman-programming/gentle-ai/gentle-sdd-continue)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/gentleman-programming/gentle-ai/gentle-sdd-continue"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/gentleman-programming/gentle-ai/gentle-sdd-continue.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00010 | $0.00858 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00429 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00172 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00086 |
Grade A, and why
gentle-sdd-continue scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
88% identical to sdd-continue — 28 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Read the SDD workflow FIRST: .claude/skills/_shared/sdd-orchestrator-workflow.md under the workspace when a workspace-scope install wrote it there, otherwise ~/.claude/skills/_shared/sdd-orchestrator-workflow.md. Then treat it as the authoritative SDD workflow instructions for this command.
The Claude Code session model is controlled by Claude Code; Gentle AI's always-on Model Assignments policy resolves every Agent tool call, including generic/organic delegation through default.
WORKFLOW:
- If the
gentle-aibinary is available, rungentle-ai sdd-continue [change] --cwd <repo>and treat its dispatcher/status output as authoritative — but only when the session artifact store isopenspecorhybrid. When the session artifact store isengram, do NOT invoke the native dispatcher at all — it cannot see the change (it reads onlyopenspec/changes/); resolve status entirely from Engram (mem_search+mem_get_observationon the change's topic keys) using the manual status schema in~/.claude/skills/_shared/sdd-status-contract.md(the same schema used when the binary is unavailable). The dispatcher is authoritative only foropenspec/hybrid. If unavailable, read~/.claude/skills/_shared/sdd-status-contract.mdand produce structured status before acting. - Resolve the active change. If
$ARGUMENTSis missing and more than one active change exists, ask the user to choose and STOP. Do not guess. - Check which artifacts already exist for the active change (proposal, specs, design, tasks)
- Determine the next phase needed based on the dependency graph: proposal → [specs ∥ design] → tasks → apply → verify → archive
- Launch the appropriate sub-agent(s) for the next phase only if authoritative status says the dependency is ready. Route only by
nextRecommendedand dependency states; never infer from free text. IfblockedReasonsis non-empty, do not proceed to apply, archive, or terminal work. IfnextRecommendedisverify, verification/remediation may run only to refresh evidence; ifnextRecommendedisresolve-blockers, reportblockedReasonsand stop; ifnextRecommendedis a planning token (propose,spec,design, ortasks), launch the corresponding planning phase. CarryactionContextand allowed edit roots into any sub-agent launch. - Present the result and ask the user to proceed
CONTEXT:
- Working directory: Detect agent-side before proceeding by running
git rev-parse --show-toplevelwith the Bash tool; if that fails, runpwdwith the Bash tool. - Current project: Derive agent-side from the detected working directory basename. Do not use slash-command shell interpolation for this value.
- Change name: $ARGUMENTS
- Execution mode: ask/cache per orchestrator
- Artifact store mode: ask/cache per orchestrator
- Delivery strategy: ask/cache per orchestrator
ENGRAM NOTE: To check which artifacts exist, search: mem_search(query: "sdd/$ARGUMENTS/", project: "{project}") to list all artifacts for this change. Sub-agents handle persistence automatically with topic_key "sdd/$ARGUMENTS/{type}".
Use the lazy workflow instructions to coordinate this workflow. Do NOT execute phase work inline when a native sub-agent is available.
STATUS CONTRACT:
Prefer gentle-ai sdd-continue [change] --cwd <repo> when available — but only when the session artifact store is openspec or hybrid; when the store is engram, do NOT invoke the binary and resolve status from Engram using the manual status schema. Otherwise read ~/.claude/skills/_shared/sdd-status-contract.md and follow it. If status reports workspace-planning with no allowed edit roots, do not launch apply/verify/archive work that would infer repo-local ownership.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago Changed 2e590958cac7
- 5d ago First seen · 36 lines · 10 tokens per session scan A 21e45577cdea
gentle-sdd-continue is a command published in the GitHub repository Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai (6,328 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 858 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 88% identical to sdd-continue, differing in 28 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
cross-audit
Second-model review. Picks an auditor (codex/gemini/opencode/aider/copilot), excludes the caller, writes a prompt to paste, reads the response back. Usage: /cross-audit [--with | list | compare].
cross-critique
Adversarial multi-angle critique. All three auditors fire in parallel (codex=technical, gemini=strategic, claude=ux). Counter-args ranked by rebuttal survival score, not raw severity. Usage: /cross-critique [--with | list | compare].
make
Refresh, reconfigure, or extend the project's harness at /.claude/. Asks the user what they want to do before invoking the CLI.
repo-consistency-sweep
Proactive defect-class detection that handles the lower-value half of code review (per Bacchelli and Bird 2013) so human reviewers stay focused on design, intent, and knowledge transfer. Catches convention drift, ordering bugs, type-safety gaps, security and multi-tenant invariants (CWE-grounded), and operability…
pr-feedback-ingest
Turn PR feedback (Greptile, CI, bots, humans) into a structured traceable backlog aligned with TASKSTATE.md, DECISIONS.md, and IMPLEMENTATIONPLAN.md so the next execution step can be a narrow implement-approved-slice or a small planning touch without losing alignment. Corrective scope only. Use when a PR is open or…
code-review
Run parallel specialized review agents and produce aggregated quality report.