Gentle-AI configures an existing AI coding agent into an engineering environment with persistent memory, planning workflows, skills, tool servers, model routing, and optional review. Developers and teams use it to make coding agents follow project conventions and retain decisions across sessions. The catalogue entries are its skills, commands, agents, and instruction.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Gentleman-Programming/gentle-aiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/gentleman-programming/gentle-ai/gentle-sdd-new)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/gentleman-programming/gentle-ai/gentle-sdd-new"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/gentleman-programming/gentle-ai/gentle-sdd-new/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/gentleman-programming/gentle-ai/gentle-sdd-new"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/gentleman-programming/gentle-ai/gentle-sdd-new.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00013 | $0.00100 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00050 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00020 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00010 |
Grade A, and why
gentle-sdd-new scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
91% identical to sdd-new — 30 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Intent: Start a new SDD change. Change name: $ARGUMENTS
Read .claude/skills/_shared/sdd-orchestrator-workflow.md under the workspace first; if absent, read ~/.claude/skills/_shared/sdd-orchestrator-workflow.md.
Delegate this intent and arguments to that authoritative lazy workflow; follow its instructions rather than defining command-local policy.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday Changed · -18 lines d6b2353a9c38
- 6d ago Changed d252f74cd7be
- 8d ago First seen · 28 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A 8d5ae261dbee
gentle-sdd-new is a command published in the GitHub repository Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai (6,475 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 100 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 91% identical to sdd-new, differing in 30 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
cross-critique
Adversarial multi-angle critique. All three auditors fire in parallel (codex=technical, gemini=strategic, claude=ux). Counter-args ranked by rebuttal survival score, not raw severity. Usage: /cross-critique [--with | list | compare].
cross-audit
Second-model review. Picks an auditor (codex/gemini/opencode/aider/copilot), excludes the caller, writes a prompt to paste, reads the response back. Usage: /cross-audit [--with | list | compare].
make
Refresh, reconfigure, or extend the project's harness at /.claude/. Asks the user what they want to do before invoking the CLI.
repo-consistency-sweep
Proactive defect-class detection that handles the lower-value half of code review (per Bacchelli and Bird 2013) so human reviewers stay focused on design, intent, and knowledge transfer. Catches convention drift, ordering bugs, type-safety gaps, security and multi-tenant invariants (CWE-grounded), and operability…
pr-feedback-ingest
Turn PR feedback (Greptile, CI, bots, humans) into a structured traceable backlog aligned with TASKSTATE.md, DECISIONS.md, and IMPLEMENTATIONPLAN.md so the next execution step can be a narrow implement-approved-slice or a small planning touch without losing alignment. Corrective scope only. Use when a PR is open or…
code-review
Run parallel specialized review agents and produce aggregated quality report.